Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
2,641 rulings found for “Wool and Fine Animal Hair”
The tariff classification of a woman’s garment from China
The tariff classification of a blanket from Lithuania
The tariff classification of a woman’s dress from China
The tariff classification of a woman’s dress from China
The tariff classification of a rug from India
The tariff classification of a rug from India
The tariff classification of a tufted rug from India
The tariff classification of a men’s woven shirt from China.
The tariff classification of parts of footwear from Russia
The tariff classification of a women’s garment from China.
The tariff classification of a woman’s upper body garment from China
The tariff classification of socks from Turkey.
The tariff classification of yarns from Turkey
The tariff classification of a women’s coat from China
The tariff classification of a woman's jacket from Colombia, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic
The tariff classification of a womantop from Hong Kong.
The tariff classification of a sweater from Bolivia.
The tariff classification of a woman’s suit-type jacket from Hong Kong
The tariff classification of a ladies wrap and shrug from China.
The tariff classification of womenknit garments from Hong Kong.
The tariff classification of women's wearing apparel from Mexico
The tariff classification of interlining woven fabric from Korea.
Handwoven handloomed wool tapestries/rugs; Mexican export visa required
Fishing vest is special article of apparel used for certain sports. Cap; hat; wool
Application for Further Review of Protest 3801-04-100419 Dear Assistant Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review (AFR) of protest no. 3801-04-100419, filed by Brintons U.S. Axminster, Inc. In reaching our decision, we also considered the information provided in protestant’s submissions of June 7, 2005 and January 3, 2006.
