CBP Rulings Search

PRD 1303-94-100253; Parts of Machines for Working Rubber or Plastics or for the Manufacture of Products From These Materials; Parts of Machine Tools for Working Hard Rubber, Hard Plastics or Similar Hard Materials; Denial of Protest for Failure to Provide Evidence in Support of Claim, 19 CFR 174.13(a)(6) Dear District Director: This is our decision on Protest No. 1303-94-100253, filedagainst your classification of certain machine parts. The entryunder protest was liquidated on August 5, 1994, and this protest timely filed on September 1, 1994. Under 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(1), a protest of a decision under subsection (a) of section 1514 must set forth distinctly and specifically each decision as to which protest is made. In addition, the Customs Regulations require that a protest set forth the nat

Application for further review of Protest no. 5501-94-100414; subheadings 6702.10.2000, 6702.90.3500, 6702.90.6500; HRL 955578

Tariff Classification of Vestoplast C 9020; Revocation of NewYork Ruling Letter (NYRL) A86113, Dated September 3, 1996

Classification of Girl’s Handbags; Backpacks; Totes

Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3801-96-104833, filed November 7, 1996, concerning the classification of unassembled footwear and the assessment of marking duties

NY A82816 Revoked; Spark Plug Boot

Classification of a down filled mattress pad

Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1512-01-100007; Classification of Mouse Pad Rolls; HQ 965139 Incorporated by Reference

Revocation of NY J87028 and NY K81794 regarding the tariff classification of massaging slippersDear Mr. Glueck:

Clarification of HQ 964625, dated September 10, 2001; Classification of waterproof hiking footwearDear Mr. Maloney:

Tariff classification of Latex Coated Fabric; Protest Number 1601-11-100135

The tariff classification of mineral separating machinesfrom Australia

The tariff classification of a child's slipper from Taiwan.

The tariff classification of an athletic supporter with protective cup, shin straps, garter belt and suspenders from Canada.

Classification of a boot liner from Korea, Hong Kong, China,Japan or Thailand.

The tariff classification of footwear and parts of footwearfrom Mexico.

The tariff classification of polyester and aramid cords fromCanada.

The tariff classification of a boot shaft from Korea. Dear Mr. Choi: In your letter dated May 17, 1991, you requested aclassification ruling. The submitted sample, your style #C-39TH, is a boot upperpart, approximately 7 1/2 inches high and 6 inches in width. Itis marked "Made in Korea". The upper, you state, is constructedof "1000 Denier Cordura Nylon" fabric backed with foam andtricot. It has eight metal eyelets, a padded plastic anklecollar, a plastic stitched-on "Pro Line" logo, located near thetop right side of the boot upper and a textile, stitched-on"Thinsulate" logo, located on the tongue. Our records show thatneither trademark is registered with Customs.

The tariff classification of wheelchairs from Taiwan

The tariff classification of a woman's low-heel shoe fromTaiwan. Dear Ms. Peterson: In your letter dated October 30, 1991, you requested aclassification ruling. The submitted sample, your style Snipit/Denim/A, is awoman's low-heel, slip-on shoe. It has an unlined textile(denim) upper with a PVC topline, a decorative PVC bow stitchedover the toes, and a plastic toe and heel overlay. The shoe alsohas, you state, a leather insole/sockliner and a leather outsole. On the breakdown sheet you indicate that the outsole iscomposition leather. In either case, we will assume for thepurposes of this ruling letter, that the black coating on it isless than .15mm thick.

The tariff classification of a child's slipper from China

The tariff classification of two metalized fancy cords from Japan.

The tariff classification of two men's wetsuits from China,Taiwan and/or Thailand

The tariff classification of scuba booties from Taiwan andHong Kong

The tariff classification of cargo control equipment fromTaiwan and Venezuela