Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
279 rulings found for “Great Falls”
Classification and country of origin determination for chenille yarns; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Classification and country of origin determination for chenille yarns; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
The tariff classification of plungers, augers, closet bolts, and flappers from Canada or Taiwan.
The tariff classification of Motorcycle Stands from the United Kingdom
Classification and country of origin determination for loop-wale yarn; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Classification and country of origin determination for a woman’s knitted jacket; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
Classification and country of origin determination for a lady’s knit pullover; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(4)
The tariff classification of a protective automobile safety seat cover from China.
The tariff classification of religious altars, statuary and shrines from Italy or Spain.
The tariff classification of a phone booth from the United Kingdom.
Internal Advice; classification of components of a hearing aid system and their eligibility for duty-free treatment under subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUSA; parts; Nairobi Protocol
The tariff classification of a servo tandem press line, base plates, and a front-of-line sound wall from Japan
Revocation of NY N230084; Revocation of NY N236254; Tariff classification of gazebos and canopy shelters
Country of Origin Marking; Lumber Imported under Plastic Covers; J-List; Confusing or Deceptive Reference to a U.S. City; 19 CFR 134.47; 19 CFR 134.36(b)
Protest 1001-97-102734; imitation toy jewelry
IA 17/98; Imitation Toy Jewelry; HRL 961396
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest Number 3304-01-100021; Engineered Structural Rafters
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3304-2016-100020; classification of soil supplement
Request for Internal Advice as to the Application of a Prekrete Lining to Steel Pipes Temporarily Imported Under Bond (TIB) and the Eligibility of NAFTA Duty Deferral
Application for further review of Protest No. 3303-91-100022; transaction value; sale for exportation Dear Sir:
Application for further review of protest no. 3304-93-100041; classification of used railroad ties; landscapingtimbers; principal use; condition as imported; HRL 954924
Protest 3304-95-100055; Remote terminal unit components; relay panels; circuit board assemblies; section XVI, note 1(m); chapter 90, note 6; 19 CFR 174.13; uniform and established practice
Applications for further review of protests ##2704-92-100232 through 2704-92-100235 concerning the assessment of antidumping duties (ADD) and interest and deemed liquidation; Section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 611(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff and Trade Act of 1984; 19 U.S.C. 1504(d); Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 95-50 (March 23, 1995); ABC International Traders v. United States, CIT Slip. Op. 95-97(May 23, 1995).
Applications for further review of protests ##2704-92-100232 through 2704-92-100235 concerning the assessment of antidumping duties (ADD) and interest and deemed liquidation; Section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 611(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff and Trade Act of 1984; 19 U.S.C. §1504(d); Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 95-50 (March 23, 1995); ABC International Traders v. United States, CIT Slip. Op. 95-97(May 23, 1995).Dear Sir:This office has received the above-referenced applications for further review (AFR) of the protests as provided for under Customs regulations. We have considered the protests and have made the following decision. As these protests involve the same protestant, arise from the same set of transactions, and are identical in every way except for the individual entry numbers, we have consolidated our response to them into one ruling.FACTS:Entries were made between September 14, 1987 and July 26, 1988 on television sets fro
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3307-97-100089, filed January 15, 1997, concerning the classification of hiking boots; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24