Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
1,907 rulings found for “Lead”
Application for Further Review of Protest Number 2704-16-101142; First Sale; Related Parties; All Costs Plus a Profit
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-23-164798; Dreamwear Inc.; First Sale Valuation; Transaction Value
Ruling Request; Deductive Value; Fallback; Post-Importation Adjustments
Internal Advice 11/89 concerning the classification of a nonwoven disposable coverall made of Tyvek spun-bonded olefin
CFTA; transformation; originating; intermediate material; value of material defined; price paid; vertically integrated producer; General Note 3(c)(vii)(M)
Harbor Maintenance Fee; User Fee; Public Laws 99-272, 99-662; 19 U.S.C. 58c
Reconsideration of HRL 556045 concerning the eligibility of telecommunications switching equipment for duty-free treatment under the GSP; substantial transformation
Internal Advice Request; buying commissions; HRL 542621; HRL 544669
Internal Advice No. 78/93; Eligibility of Christmas tree light sets from Macau for duty-free treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)
Vessel Repair Entry No. C31-0013814-9; M.S. SEAFISHER V-4; Modification; Repair; Parts; Materials; 19 U.S.C. 1466
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3801-94-106710 concerning the applicability of subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, to Ford Taurus Station Wagons; detrimental reliance; uniform and established practice; 19 U.S.C. 1315(d); Article 509; NAFTA
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 0901-95-100006 concerning the applicability of subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, to Ford Taurus Station Wagons; detrimental reliance; uniform and established practice; 19 U.S.C. 1315(d); NAFTA; Article 509
Protest 3901-96-102085; 19 U.S.C. 1313(b); T.D. 81-74; manufacturing drawback; general drawback contract; steel; waste; scrap; established and uniform practice; C.S.D. 80- 137; HQ 226184
Foreign-Trade Zones; Retail Trade; Exportation; Swan and Finch Co. v. U.S.; Witco Chemical Corp. v. U.S.; Nissan Motor Manufacturing Corp. U.S.A. v. U.S.; The Conqueror; Roehl Transport Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals; Roland Electric Co. v. Walling, Wage and Hour Administrator; 19 U.S.C. 81c(a); 19 U.S.C. 81o(d); 19 U.S.C. 1309; 19 U.S.C. 1322(a); 19 CFR 101.1; 19 CFR 146.66; diesel fuel; sale for consumption; Export Clause; instruments of international traffic; International Fuel Tax Agreement; zone-restricted status; HQs 223828, 224935
Reconsideration of Application for Further Review of ProtestNo. 3801-94-106710 concerningthe applicability of subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, to Ford Taurus station wagons; detrimental reliance;uniform and established practice; 19 U.S.C. 1315(d); PeugeotMotors; General Note 3(d)
Vessel Repair; Application for relief; M/V PRESIDENTJACKSON, Voyage 79; Entry No. 110-6461898-3; Modifications;Inspection; Staging; Cleaning; Survey; Maintenance; 19 C.F.R.4.14(d); 19 U.S.C. 1466
Request for Internal Advice concerning manipulation or manufacture in a foreign trade zone ("FTZ") per 19 C.F.R. §177.11(b)(2); Manipulation/Manufacture of Oil Country Tubular Goods in Foreign Trade Zone Status; Coating; Foreign Trade Zone; FTZ; Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc., Plaintiffs v. U.S. Secretary of Labor, Defendant, Slip Op. 97-161, (CIT), 31 Cust. Bull., No. 52, 72, 73-79; Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assoc. v. United States, 207 U.S. 556 (1907), United States v. International Paint Co., 35 CCPA 87 (1948).
Protest 2704-97-102814; Suncatchers
Protest No. 5301-96-100494, acetaldehyde, ethanal; NAFTA Certificate of Origin; 5301-96-200154
Internal advice request; Country of origin marking of garbanzo beans; Chapter 20 Note, 19 CFR 102.20; packing, canning
Protest 2501-00-100049; cosmetic sets; packaging.
Application for Further Review of Protest 4103-96-100183; related parties; sale for exportation to the U.S. Dear Port Director: This is in response to your memorandum dated July 29, 1997, forwarding an Application for Further Review (AFR) of Protest 4103-96-100183. The protest was submitted by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman, counsel on behalf of MII. The request concerns the appraisement of 5 entries of ladies wearing apparel based on transactions between UUU, SSS, TTT and MMM related factories, MII (related middleman/importer of record/protestant) and the LDS (U.S. related purchasers). Counsel states that it is his understanding that these entries are "test" entries, and that the result of this protest and AFR will have an impact upon a number of entries which have been suspended.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 0712-99-100169; classification of textile materials for technical useDear Port Director:
Protest number 1401-02-100161; Request for Further Review of Protest; Classification; Mistake of fact; 19 USC § 1520(c); essential character; General Rules of Interpretation.
Internal Advice; price actually paid or payable; sale for exportation; fallback method Dear Mr. Kudelka: