Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
8,928 rulings found for “Footwear”
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The classification, country of origin, and marking of footwear parts from China
The tariff classification of women’s footwear from China
The tariff classification of motocross boots from Italy
Tariff Classification and Eligibility for Preferential Tariff Treatment under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (“DRCAFTA”) of Waterproof Rubber Boots for Women
Footwear, athletic, w/removable liners; Liners removable; Sets; Composite goods; Essential character; External surface area; T.D. 84-59; HRL's 955705, 952170, 086055, 953219, 953452
Internal Advice Request No. 19/97; Ladies' Cold Weather Boot; T.D. 93-88; Not Designed/Intended to be Cuffed
Classification of a women’s slip-on shoe with outer sole of textile and rubber/plastics
Dutiability of Consulting Fees; Assists
Application for Further Review of Protest number 4701-06-100549; Classification of the Instride® Advantage™ Dual Purpose Ankle-Foot Gauntlet
Tariff Classification and Eligibility for Preferential Tariff Treatment under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (“DRCAFTA”) of Rubber Boots
Classification of glass beaded footwear
Formed upper of a slipper
Request for reconsideration of HeadquartersRuling Letter (HRL) 087847 dated September 26, 1990,concerning the tariff classification of a low-cutboy's athletic shoe. Band, foxing-like; Overlap;Encirclement, substantialDear Ms. Maguire:In a memorandum dated October 9, 1990, you asked that we reconsider the result reached in the subject letter.FACTS:The shoe in issue has a plastic upper. The bottom of the shoe is rubber and plastics and is of unit molded construction. Our examination of the sample reveals that while the toe bumper overlaps 30 percent of the perimeter of the upper by more than 1/4 inch, the overlap of the upper along the remaining perimeter of the shoe measures approximately 1/16 inch or slightly more.In HRL 087847 dated September 26, 1990, Customs held that the above-described low-cut boy's athletic shoe, Stock no. 73238, was classifiable under subheading 6402.99.15, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), as other footwear with outer soles a
Footwear, athletic. Upper, external surface area; Accessories or reinforcements
Men's high-top athletic hiking shoe; external surface area of the upper; chapter 64; note 4(a) to chapter 64; accessories or reinforcements; subheading 6402.91.70/80/90; HRL 081305; HRL 087788; HRL 950666; NYRL 867245
NY 866668; children's boots; accessories and reinforcements; loosely attached appurtenances; HRL 082661; NYRL 809843; NYRL 812613
Footwear; Golf Shoes; Uppers of Plastic Laminated Leather; Explanatory Note 41.09(2); Explanatory Note (D) to Chapter 64; GRI 3(b); HQ 088390
Protest 3801-2-102728; Sandals, beachcomber; Accessories and reinforcements; 081297
