Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
18,980 rulings found for “Rubber”
Revocation of NY N161242; Classification of sandals from China
The tariff classification of brass fittings, plastic push buttons and rubber o-rings from Mexico.
The tariff classification and status under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), of footwear from China; Article 509
The tariff classification of footwear produced in El Salvador and the eligibility for preferential treatment under the Dominican Republic – Central America – United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA).
The tariff classification of footwear produced in El Salvador and the eligibility for preferential treatment under the Dominican Republic – Central America – United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA).
The tariff classification of footwear produced in El Salvador and the eligibility for preferential treatment under the Dominican Republic – Central America – Unites States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA).
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam, Portugal and Indonesia
The tariff classification and GSP eligibility of steel belted radial tires from Serbia
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification and country of origin marking of shells, end-caps and O-rings from China
The tariff classification of footwear from Myanmar
The tariff classification of footwear from Myanmar
The tariff classification of footwear from China; Correction to N316410
Country of Origin; Grease seal; Section 301 trade remedy
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of various molded footwear from China
Protest 5501-93-100156; Footwear; Slippers, lighted; Composite goods; Essential character; GRI 3(b); HRL 087336
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-95-103056, filed October 12, 1995, concerning the classification of men’s sandals; Notes 3 and 4 to Chapter 64; External Surface Area of Upper; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, 20 C.I.T. 1046, Slip Op. 96-139 (1996 Ct. Intl. Trade); 958 F. Supp. 637, Slip Op. 97-24, (1997 Ct. Intl. Trade)
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-98-101498, Filed May 28, 1998, concerning the classification of women's shoes
Reconsideration of NY G85394; Soles which Overlap Upper; Not "Mock," "Imitation," or "Fake" Welt; Not Foxing-like Band; T.D. 93-88; T.D. 83-116
Request for Reconsideration of NY N087755; Classification of the “Rivershed” Boot.
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3901-18-100410; Classification of Styrene-Isoprene Block Copolymer
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4197-24-107768; Classification of a Bearing Shock Mount
Footwear; Parts of footwear; Pullovers, studded; Shoe spikes with straps; Composite goods; Essential Character; U.S. v. Willoughby Camera Stores; Gallagher & Ascher Company v. U.S.; HRL's 084088, 087541, 955987; DD 898471 revoked
