Base
F821822000-02-03New YorkClassification

The tariff classification for a toy set imported from China.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

9503.70.000

Compare All →

Court Cases

3 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

26 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-26 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification for a toy set imported from China.

Ruling Text

PD F82182 February 3, 2000 CLA-2-95;CO:CH:D12 F82182 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9503.70.000 Ruby L. Wood Senior Vice President Evans and Wood & Co., Inc. P.O. Box 610005 DFW Airport, TX 75261 RE: The tariff classification for a toy set imported from China. Dear Ms. Wood: In your letter you requested a tariff classification ruling in behalf of your client, Today’s Plastics, for a battery operated electronic baby baseball set. Item 220 is made of plastic and contains electronics. When a toddler hits the ball off the roly-poly base, sounds, music and lights are activated. The set includes a bat, base, electronic tee and baseball. The set is designed for use by toddlers aged 6 months to 36 months. The item will be imported through the port of Dallas. The applicable subheading for all set 220 will be 9503.70.0000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for “Other toys, put up in sets or outfits…….”.The rate of duty will be free. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Robyn Dessaure Port Director Chicago, Illinois

Related Rulings for HTS 9503.70.000

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (3)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.