Base
8853701993-04-27New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a wall clock made in Taiwan.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

9105.21.80

$2.8M monthly imports

Compare All →

Court Cases

1 case

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

33 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-28 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of a wall clock made in Taiwan.

Ruling Text

NY 885370 April 27, 1993 CLA-2-:91:S:N:N8:344 885370 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9105.21.80 Ms. Mary Achterhof Sligh Clocks 1201 Industrial Avenue Holland, Michigan 49423 RE: The tariff classification of a wall clock made in Taiwan. Dear Ms. Achterhof: In your letter of April 14, 1993, you requested a tariff classification ruling on a wall clock. You have not submitted a sample, however, you have provided descriptive literature. The Melrose wall clock, style # 0731-1- CM, is battery operated with a quartz analog clock movement contained in a wooden case. The clock measures 16" W x 2 3/8" D x 16" H. The applicable subheading for the Melrose wall clock will be 9105.21.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Wall clocks: Battery or AC powered: Other. The rate of duty will be 30 cents each plus 6.9% on the case and 5.3% on the battery. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport 

Related Rulings for HTS 9105.21.80

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.