Commerce Department, International Trade Administration
On November 28, 2005, the United States Court of International Trade ("CIT") issued an order sustaining the Department of Commerce's ("the Department") Second Remand Results. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Globe Metallurgical, Inc. vs. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 03-00202 (October 21, 2005) (available at http://www.ia.ita.doc.gov) ("Second Remand Results"); see also, Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 05-150 (CIT November 28, 2005) ("Globe Metallurgical III"). In the First Remand Results, the Department recalculated the antidumping margins for Bratsk Aluminum Smelter and Rual Trade Limited (collectively, "Bratsk") and ZAO Kremny and SUAL-Kremny-Ural Ltd. (collectively, "Kremny") to value the respondents' usage of recycled silicon metal sized zero to five millimeters. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 03-00202 (January 5, 2005) (available at http://www.ia.ita.doc.gov) ("First Remand Results"). In the Second Remand Results, the Department recalculated the adverse facts available ("AFA") portion of Kremny's antidumping duty margin using the revised antidumping duty margin for Bratsk calculated in the First Remand Results. Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit") in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) ("Timken"), the Department is notifying the public that the Globe Metallurgical III decision is "not in harmony" with the Department's final determination.
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-821-817] ACTION: Notice of Decision of the Court of International Trade. AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 14, 2005. SUMMARY: On November 28, 2005, the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) issued an order sustaining the Department of Commerce's (“the Department”) Second Remand Results . See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand , Globe Metallurgical, Inc. vs. United States , Consol. Ct. No. 03-00202 (October 21, 2005) (available at http://www.ia.ita.doc.gov ) (“ Second Remand Results ”); see also , Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United States , Slip Op. 05-150 (CIT November 28, 2005) (“Globe Metallurgical III”). In the First Remand Results , the Department recalculated the antidumping margins for Bratsk Aluminum Smelter and Rual Trade Limited (collectively, “Bratsk”) and ZAO Kremny and SUAL-Kremny-Ural Ltd. (collectively, “Kremny”) to value the respondents' usage of recycled silicon metal sized zero to five millimeters. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United States , Consol. Ct. No. 03-00202 (January 5, 2005) (available at http://www.ia.ita.doc.gov ) (“ First Remand Results ”). In the Second Remand Results , the Department recalculated the adverse facts available…
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Silicon Metal From Russia: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Silicon Metal From the Russian Federation: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
Citation: 70 FR 73989