Base
Notice2026-146462026-07-21

MAC Industries Inc. dba MAC Container Line, Complainant v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd., COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc., and COSCO Shipping Lines (India) Private, Respondents; Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint

Federal Maritime Commission

Document Excerpt

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Federal Maritime Commission [Docket No. 25-29] Notice is given that an amended complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (the “Commission”) by MAC Industries Inc. dba MAC Container Line (the “Complainant”) against COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. (COSCO), COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc., and COSCO Shipping Lines (India) Private (the “Respondents”). Complainant states that the Commission has jurisdiction over the complaint pursuant to the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended, 46 U.S.C. 40101 et seq., and over Respondent COSCO as a “common carrier” and a vessel operating “ocean common carrier” and over COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc. and COSCO Shipping Lines (India) Private as general agents of COSCO. Complainant is a non-vessel-operating common carrier headquartered in San Clemente, California. Complainant identifies Respondent COSCO as a global ocean carrier with its corporate office in Shanghai, China, conducting business in the United States through its general agent, Respondent COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc., a company existing under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business in Secaucus, New Jersey, and conducting business in India through Respondent COSCO Shipping Lines (India) Private, with a principal corporate office in Mumbai, India. Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(b)(2) , 41102(c) , 41102(d) , and 41104(a)(2)(A) , (a)(

Read full document on FederalRegister.gov →

Related Documents

Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.

Full Document

Citation: 91 FR 45815