Base
Notice2025-239552025-12-30

MAC Industries Inc. dba MAC Container Line, Complainant v. COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. and COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc., Respondents; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

Federal Maritime Commission

Document Excerpt

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Federal Maritime Commission [Docket No. 25-29] ( printed page 61150) Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (the “Commission”) by MAC Industries Inc. dba MAC Container Line (the “Complainant”) against COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. and COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc. (the “Respondents”). Complainant states that the Commission has jurisdiction over the complaint pursuant to the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41301-41307 ; the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022; and 46 CFR part 502 and jurisdiction over Respondents as a vessel-operating common carrier and its United States agent. Complainant is a non-vessel-operating common carrier organized and existing under the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in San Clemente, California. Complainant identifies Respondent COSCO Shipping Lines Co., Ltd. as a vessel-operating common carrier organized and existing under the laws of the People's Republic of China with its principal place of business in Shanghai, China whose agent in the United States is Respondent COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc., a corporation with its principal place of business in Secaucus, New Jersey. Complainant alleges that Respondents violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) and 41104(a)(2) , (3), and (10). Complainant alleges these violations arose from Respondents' unreasonable assessment of detention charges even after Respondents had taken control of the

Read full document on FederalRegister.gov →

Related Documents

Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.

Full Document

Citation: 90 FR 61150