Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
8,923 rulings found for “Footwear”
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China, Taiwan, and/or Brazil
The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil
The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil
The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam
The tariff classification of footwear from Brazil.
The tariff classification of footwear from Vietnam or China
The tariff classification of footwear China
The tariff classification and Trade Agreement eligibility of footwear from Dubai
Tariff classification of moon boots
Footwear, Athletic Shoes; Foxing-like Band; Toe Bumper; T.D. 83-116; Reconsideration of HQ 088873
Applicability of duty exemption under U.S. Note 2(b), subchapter II, Chapter 98, HTSUSA, to ribbons and bows produced in Haiti or the Dominican Republic
Country of origin marking of athletic footwear; unformed uppers further processed into finished footwear; substantial transformation; HQ 953017; HQ 730155
Cycling Shoes; External Surface Area of Upper (ESAU); Note 4 to Chapter 64; Additional U.S. Note 1(b) to Chapter 64; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3307-96-100056, filed October 24, 1996, concerning the classification of hiking boots; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24
Reconsideration of HQ 959429; Classification of Women's Boots; Ruling Correct on Face; New Ruling Based on New Sample Submitted
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-99-100291, filed January 14, 1999, concerning the classification of women’s shoes.
Reconsideration of NY J82448; Classification of athletic footwear from China; Ruling Correct on Face; New Ruling Based on New Sample Submitted Dear Mr. Crain: This letter is in response to your request of May 14, 2003, for reconsideration of NY J82448, dated April 11, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted at the time of the original determination. A separate sample was submitted with your current request. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) J82448, dated April 11, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "The Quicks Mid Jr., Pattern No. 5082-1EL" and "Too Quicks Mid Jr., Pattern No. 82902-1EL" were classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair," with a general column one rate of duty of 2
AFTA; unused merchandise drawback; direct identification; fungibility; commingling; origin; footwear; 19 U.S.C. § 1313(j)(1); 19 CFR § 181.45 (b) (2) (i) (A) ; 19 CFR 191.14 (b) (5) ; HQ 229403
Reconsideration of NY K80149; Classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This letter is in response to your request of January 13, 2004, on behalf of your client, Reebok, for reconsideration of NY K80149, dated November 12, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted with your request. In preparing this decision, consideration was given to the conference held between you and members of my staff on March 31, 2004. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) K80149, dated November 12, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "ATR Flare" was classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair." The determination was based upon an examination of a sample identified as the "ATR Flare" and a fin
Reconsideration of NY N179475; Classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of children’s footwear from China and Vietnam.
