Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
41,069 rulings found for “HQ”
Request for reconsideration of NY I86076; Tariff classification of basket style rattan handbag from China
Electrical corona camera with a photon counter
Ruling Request for Vibratory Plates and Rammers; Headings 8429 and 8467; tools for working in the hand; self-propelled tamping machines; ENs 84.29, 84.67; GRI 3(a); Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. U.S.
Revocation of NY D88805; Classification of blank cards; Heading 4909; Heading 4911; Heading 4817
Revocation of NY E86598; Classification of blank cards; Heading 4909; Heading 4911; Heading 4817
Request for reconsideration of NY I85107, dated August 21, 2002, concerning the classification of wristlets Dear Ms. Bowers: This is in reply to your letter of April 9, 2003, requesting reconsideration of the classification of wristlets in New York Ruling Letter (NY) I85107, dated August 21, 2002. Samples were submitted for our examination. FACTS: The two samples at issue are "wristlets" which are sold in bulk to the floral industry for the florist or designer to attach a corsage or other element for display on the wrist. They may also be used to attach design elements to surfaces such as around vases, door handles, church pews, or to add a floral/design accent. Sample 1, which was the subject, in part, of NY I85107, is composed of knit lace of man-made fibers with a textile hook and loop wristband and an aluminum frame. Sample 2, which is similar to Sample 1, is composed of woven man-made fiber fabric with a textile hook and loop wristband and an aluminum frame.
Reconsideration of NY J82448; Classification of athletic footwear from China; Ruling Correct on Face; New Ruling Based on New Sample Submitted Dear Mr. Crain: This letter is in response to your request of May 14, 2003, for reconsideration of NY J82448, dated April 11, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted at the time of the original determination. A separate sample was submitted with your current request. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) J82448, dated April 11, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "The Quicks Mid Jr., Pattern No. 5082-1EL" and "Too Quicks Mid Jr., Pattern No. 82902-1EL" were classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair," with a general column one rate of duty of 2
Protest 4601-02-103917; Brass Housings for Faucet Aerators
Modification of NY 842039; vibratory plates and rammers
Tariff classification of solid cork disks Dear Mr. Gnann: This letter is in reply to your correspondence of June 4, 2003, to the National Commodity Specialists Division, New York, NY in which you request a binding ruling of the tariff classification of solid cork disks under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). The matter was referred to this office for a response. Samples were submitted for our examination. FACTS: The samples you have submitted are solid natural cork or agglomerated cork. You state the discs are typically 1.25" in diameter x 0.50" thick and are labeled as "rings." However, the samples you have submitted measure 1 ¼" by ¼", 1 1/8" by ¼", and 1 ¼" by ½". ISSUE: What is the classification of the above-described natural and agglomerated cork articles?LAW AND ANALYSIS: Classification of goods under the HTSUS is governed by the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI). GRI 1 provides that classification shall be determined acco
Classification of a Ski Pant, Style number 21305; 19 U.S.C. §1625; Treatment; 19 CFR 177.12
Aircraft; Outward Manifest; Consolidated Shipments; House Air Waybills; 19 CFR 122.48, 122.73, 122.75
Vessel Repair Entry C20-0038546-1; CSX CHALLENGER; 19 U.S.C. 1466; Protest No. 2002-02-101207
19 U.S.C. 1466; Vessel Repair Entry C16-0017371-5; M/V LYKES DISCOVERER; Protest No. 1601-03-100445
46 U.S.C. App. § 292; Mobile Mechanical Dewatering System; Floating Lagoon Pumper; Vessel
Knives; Switchblade Knives; Balisong Knives; Butterfly Knives; 15 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1245
AFR 5301-02-100200; drawback; prior notice of exportation; unused merchandise drawback; waiver of prior notice of exportation; evidence of exportation; 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1); 19 CFR 191.35; 19 CFR 191.36
Bona Fide Sale; Nissho Iwai; Multi-tiered Transactions
ponse to your letters dated April 20, 2004 and July 26, 2004, on behalf of your client, Jem Strapping Systems ("Jem"), requesting a ruling on the country of origin marking requirements for waxed steel strapping imported into the United States from Canada. Photographs of the steel strapping were submitted with your request.
Tariff Classification and NAFTA Eligibility for "House Fly Trap"
Country of Origin; Substantial Transformation; Rough Rubies Mined in Burma; Heat Treatment, Cutting and Polishing
Modification of NY J82071; Tariff Classification of Decorative Wired Trim
NY F81413 revoked; Plastic identification badges Dear Ms. Thatcher: This is in reference to your letter, dated May 19, 2003, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, New York, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter ("NY") F81413, dated January 5, 2000, regarding the classification of several styles of plastic identification badges, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS"). Your letter and samples of the articles were forwarded to this office for reply. We have reconsidered the classification determination made in NY F81413 and determined that it is incorrect. This letter sets forth the correct classification of the plastic identification badges.
Modification of NY J81433; Metalized Polyester Embroidery Thread
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1101-03-100207 Dear Sir: This is in response to the Application for Further Review of Protest Number 1101-03-100207 that you forwarded to our office for review. The protest was timely filed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a licensed Customs Broker, on behalf of Verseidag Indutex GMBH, against the liquidation of certain textile/plastics material under subheading 5903.10.2500 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). The protest covers two entries. FACTS: The protest covers two entries of merchandise imported through the Port of Philadelphia. On June 23, 2003, the protestant entered one shipment of Seemee Mesh Premium FR fabric. On October 7, 2002, the protestant entered one shipment of Seemee Mesh Premium fabric, MMT Frontlit Premium fabric, and MMT Backlit Premium fabric. The fabrics were imported into the United States from Germany under subheading 5903.90.1500, HTSUSA, the provision for "Textile fabric
