Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
41,069 rulings found for “HQ”
Instruments of International Traffic; 19 U.S.C. § 1322(a); 19 CFR § 10.41a; Stainless steel tanks
46 U.S.C. App. 883; Third proviso; Coastwise transportation
19 U.S.C. 1466; LURLINE, V-812E; Vessel Repair Entry No. C28-0242049-0; Application; Modifications to vessel
Pipes; drug paraphernalia; 21 U.S.C. § 863
Vessel Repair Entry No. 110-7995853-1; APL KOREA; V-30E; Staging; Parts; 19 U.S.C. § 1466
46 U.S.C. App. 883; Coastwise transportation; 19 CFR 4.80b(a)
46 U.S.C. App. 883; Third proviso; Coastwise transportation
19 U.S.C. 1466; 19 U.S.C. 1466(h)(3); PRESIDENT WILSON, V-011; Vessel Repair Entry No. C27-0171042-1; Petition
IIT; cardboard boxes; 19 U.S.C. § 1322(a); 19 CFR § 10.41a
Vessel Clearance; 19 CFR § 4.75; 46 U.S.C. App. § 91
19 U.S.C. 1466; APL PHILIPPINES, V-29; Vessel Repair Entry No. 110-7995907-5; Petition
Internal Advice; Notice to Redeliver; Textiles; Visa; 19 CFR § 141.113(b)
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5201-96-100640; Request for Reliquidation; Proper Protest under 19 U.S.C. 1514; 19 U.S.C. 1520(c)(1); 19 U.S.C. 1313; Drawback; Mistake of Fact; Correctable Error Must be Manifest from the Record or Established by Documentary Evidence; Defective Certificates of Delivery
AFR of Protest No. 3004-96-100611; APTA; Canadian article; NAFTA; originating good
Country of origin marking of ladies woven cotton pant; use of sewn-in “Superlabel Premium”; permanence
Eligibility of footwear samples for duty-free treatment
Country of origin marking of casings; 19 CFR 134.35(a)
Country of origin of textiles; 19 CFR 102.21
Eligibility of heavy duty payload transporters for duty- free treatment under subheading 9808.00.80 Dear Mr. Juranek:
Country of origin marking of imported baskets and moss; 19 CFR 134.46 Dear Mr. Stedfast:
eleased to you with some material redacted pursuant to exemptions (b)(2), (b)(7)(C) and (b)(7)(E) of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2), (b)(7)(C) and (b)(7)(E)).
he New York State Supreme Court. On October 20, 1998, the Area Director, Newark/New York responded to the request. She determined that all documents pertaining to the entry were exempt from disclosure pursuant to exemption (b)(4) of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)).
ithheld in their entirety pursuant to Exemption (b)(5) of the FOIA (5 U.S.C.552(b)(5)). You appeal the material redacted from the documents released in response to the initial request and also the withholding in their entirety of the other five documents.
eleased and others, or portions thereof, were withheld pursuant to Exemptions (b)(2), (b)(7)(C) and (b)(7)(D) of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2), (b)(7)(C) and (b)(7)(D)). You state in your appeal that you believe the documents provided to you to be incomplete.
f which would reveal investigative practices, which, if disclosed, would assist violators and potential violators in circumventing the laws and regulations, avoiding detection and evading apprehension (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2)).
