Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
18,991 rulings found for “Rubber”
Protest and Application for Further Review No. 2006-13-100005; Classification of below-the-ankle, closed toe and closed heel slip-on footwear.
The tariff classification and country of origin of an oil seal and tapered roller bearing cone assembly
The country of origin and status under the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (UKFTA) of the Pokit Pro
Revocation of NY N336132; Tariff Classification of Men’s Footwear from Vietnam
Petition by Domestic Interested Party; Outer Soles of Textile; Tariff Engineering; Not Fraud or Artifice.
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-15-100126 Classification of Eight Styles of Textile Fabric
Belts or belting used with harvesters; belts and belting made of textile material and coated with vulcanized rubber; conveyer or transmission belts or belting; parts of machines; Section XVI, Note 1(a); harvesters; parts of agricultural machinery classified in heading 8433; Section XXII, Chapter 98, Subchapter XVII, U.S. Note 2; actual use; Customs Regulation 10.133
Protest no. 2002-92-100270; Boots, textile and leather; Uppers, external surface area; Footwear, athletic; Accessories and reinforcements; Delayed effective date; T.D. 92-32
Protest 2704-93-101982; Uppers, external surface area; Appurtenances, loosely attached; plausible upper material; Accessories /Reinforcements; Note 4(a) to Chapter 64; HRL's 950944,082661,085106,085381,087430; United States v. Castelazo & Associates; Inter-Pacific Corp., v. United States
Protest Number 3501-93-100383; footwear; roller skates
Protest Number 3501-93-100425; footwear; roller skates
Modification of NY G80670; Below the Ankle Hiking Shoe; Not Athletic Footwear; T.D. 92-32.
Request for Reconsideration of NY N058471; Tariff Classification of Footwear from China
Modification of NY G82337; Classification of Certain Medical Alert Bracelets
Applicability of the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.80,HTSUS; Elastic trim; NY 809995; HRL 555128; HRL 554531; HRL 555128;HRL 556627; Samsonite Corp. v. United States, 12 CIT 1146, 702 F. Supp. 908(1988), aff'd, 889 F.2d 1074 (1989); U.S. Note 2(b), subchapter II, Chapter 98,HTSUS; T.D. 91-88 Dear Mr. Bernstein:
Appraisement of rubber dams and marine fenders; Bona Fide Sale; HRLs 545105, 545709, 545144
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-99-100787, filedMarch 25, 1999, Concerning the Classification of Sandals; Additional U.S. Note 2 to Chapter 64, HTSUSA; "Athletic Footwear"
Request for Reconsideration of NY G86979; Football Shoe, Artificial Turf, Not Sports Footwear.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5201-01-100262; Classification of Ladies Footwear; Sufficiency of Protest.
Protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333; Faucet Aerators: Parts: Accessories Dear Port Director: This is our decision on protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333 filed by counsel on behalf of NEOPERL Company, Inc., against your action regarding the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of parts for faucet aerators. FACTS: The merchandise at issue was liquidated on January 5, 2001, and a protest with application for further review was filed on January 24, 2001. The protest was denied on December 13, 2002, but he denial was set aside under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1515(d) at the request of the counsel for the protestant by letter, dated February 4, 2003. Under 19 U.S.C. 1515(d). Customs and Border Protection (CBP) "may on its own initiative, or pursuant to a written request by the protesting party filed with the appropriate port director within 90 days after the date of the protest denial, void the denial of the protest." After s
Tariff classification of two-piece leveling machinery mounts made of metal and rubber
Application for Further Review of Protest number 4701-06-100549; Classification of the Instride® Advantage™ Dual Purpose Ankle-Foot Gauntlet
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2809-12-100073; Classification of welt footwear from China
Modification of HQ H012677, dated February 15, 2008; Classification of Aquatic Training Shoes
Revocation of NY N050746; Tariff classification of spare parts/repair kit
