Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
18,991 rulings found for “Rubber”
The tariff classification, country of origin and marking of ponytail holders from Taiwan; 19 CFR 102.21(c)(2); tariff shift
Protest 4115-94-100005; Automotive Components; Explanatory Notes 48.23, 84.21, 85.01, and 85.12; Chapter 39, Note 2(p); Chapter 90, Note 6; Section XVI, Notes 1(a) and 2; Section XVII, Notes 2(a) and (f); HQs 951279, 951976, and 954581; Intercargo Insurance Co., f/k/a International Cargo & Surety Co. (Surety for M.Genauer) v. U.S.; 3923.90.00; 3926.90.90; 4823.90.85; 5911.90.00; 7318.15.20; 7318.21.00; 7318.22.00; 7320.90.10; 8301.60.00; 8414.90.90; 8421.99.00; 8501.10.40; 8503.00.40; 8512.90.90; 8536.41.00; 9032.90.60
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 3002-17-100171; Classification of Protective Footwear
Internal Advice request 55/90; woven fabrics coated with 48percent styrene, 52 percent butadiene, are not rubberized fabricsof heading 5906; coatings with styrene content greater than 40percent are presumed to be plastics.
Applicability of the partial duty exemption under subheading9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule United States, totextile products designed for use as offset printing blankets
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2720-03-100142; Rock climbing shoes not "sports footwear"
Application for Further Review of Protest 4701-2007-100553; eligibility of gold jewelry for duty-free treatment under the GSP; semi-precious stones
Tariff classification of rubber boot bottoms manufactured in Canada.
Country of Origin marking and Tariff Classification of Nakiuk Fur boots from Canada
Slippers
Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 854037 dated July 18, 1990, concerning the tariff classification of a mountaineering boot with two liners. NYRL 854037 affirmed. Boot, mountaineering; Band foxing-like
Insoles
Classification of a hot water bottle and its textile covering; Headings 4014 and 6307
Reconsideration of Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 088771 dated April 30, 1991, and New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 857390 dated November 19, 1990. Insole, polyurethane/nylon HRL 088771 and NYRL 857390 modified
Men's high-top athletic hiking shoe; external surface area of the upper; chapter 64; note 4(a) to chapter 64; accessories or reinforcements; subheading 6402.91.70/80/90; HRL 081305; HRL 087788; HRL 950666; NYRL 867245
Protest No. 3901-91-100892; Doctor Blade Holders; PartsThereof; 8443.90.50; HQ 085354; HQ 083183; Note 2(b) to SectionXVI; Note 2 to Chapter 84
Boots; GRI 1; external surface area; foxing-like band; T.D. 83-116
Applicability of vessel loops from Mexico for complete or partial duty exemption; Subheading 9018.90.80, HTSUS; Marking
Footwear; Shoes, bowling; Sole, external surface area: Textile materials; HRL 952745; DD 800938 and NYRL 803238 affirmed
Cycling Shoes; External Surface Area of Upper (ESAU); Note 4 to Chapter 64; Additional U.S. Note 1(b) to Chapter 64; High-Tech Sports, USA v. United States, Slip Op. 96-139, Slip Op. 97-24
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5501-97-100218, filed July 9, 1997, concerning the classification of women's shoes
Classification of a diaphragm; heading 8708; parts of motorvehicles; Note 1(e) to Section XVI; Note 2(a) and (e) to Section XVII;heading 5911
Country of origin marking of marking of Luran® S; blending; Germany; 19 CFR 134.35(a)
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2304-97-100068, filed February 27, 1997, concerning the classification of men’s soccer shoes
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-99-100291, filed January 14, 1999, concerning the classification of women’s shoes.
