CBP Rulings Search

Modification of NYRL 882874; tariff classification of a nylon bag for a beach blanket; GRI 5(a); of a kind normally sold therewith; GRI 3(b); composite goods.

Protest 1101-94-100601; Industrial glassware; Laboratory glassware; EN 70.17; Nippon Kogasku (USA) Inc. v. United States, C.J. Tower & Sons v. United States; HRLs 955424, 955015, 951094, 086214, 087359.

Classification of woven cotton flannel boxers in a bag

Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 808108 of April 3, 1995, and District Decision (DD) 807498 of March 13, 1995

IA 55/95; bona fide sale; J.L. Wood; sale for exportation; transfer of title; risk of loss; HRL 545105; roles of the parties and circumstances of the transaction indicate that the parties are functioning as buyer and seller; HRL 544513

Prospective Ruling Request; Buying Commissions - Rite Aid Corporation

Country of origin marking for wearing apparel such asskirts, blouses, and trousers with hangtags containing atrademark with a non-origin geographical reference; conspicuous; 19 CFR 134.47; 19 CFR 134.46

Protest 1101-97-100115; TriScan Inspection System; TriScan In-Line Process Controller; TriScan Calibration Toolkit for Chip Mounting Machine; Optical Measuring or Checking Instruments, Appliances, and Machines; Process Controller; Machines and Mechanical Appliances Having Individual Functions; Headings 8479, 8537, 9031; Legal Note 1(m) to Section XVI; HQs 954117, 954682

PD C84962, PD C84963 affirmed; Key chains

Revocation of NY C82327, C82940, C82941 and B83722; Decorative Molded Three-Dimensional Holiday Candles; Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc. v. United States; Festive Articles

Handbags with Coin Purse/Key Rings; Sets; Not Composite Goods

Clarification of PD D82557, issued October 8, 1998; Tote Bag with Coin Purse; Goods Put Up in a Set; Not Composite Good

19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2); 19 CFR 191.2(1)

Protest No. 1101-01-100228 and Application for Further Review; 19 U.S.C. §1504(d); 19 U.S.C. §1677g; "deemed liquidation"; liquidation instructions; Fujitsu General America, Inc. v. United States

AFR Protest No. 1101-02-100248; antidumping duties; deemed liquidation; 19 U.S.C. 1504(d); 19 CFR 353.26; International Trading Co. v. United States; Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States; Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States

Protest No. 1101-02-100476; 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c)(1); classification; Arthur L. Franklin d/b/a Health Technologies Network v. United States, 135 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2001) rev’d Arthur L. Franklin v. United States, 289 F. 3d 753 (Fed. Cir. 2002); HQ 963265 (March 12, 2002); HQ 228021 (July 9, 1998); HQ 227931 (April 8, 1998); HQ 223478 (February 21, 1992); HQ 222610(November 7, 1990); HQ 302144 (ORR Ruling 75-0026)(January 24, 1975); Executone Information Systems v. United States, 96 F. 3d 1383(Fed. Cir. 1996)

AFR; Protests 1101-01-100060 and 1101-01-100057; NAFTA Certificate of Origin; power of attorney; wholly owned subsidiary; parent company; authority; signor; agency; crude rough stone gypsum; 19 CFR § 181.22(b)(2).

Request for classification of printed sheet for the production of cartonsand boxes

Protest 5401-00-100024; Joint Advantage® tablets

Protest No. 1101-01-100116; glass vials used with chromatography equipment Dear Port Director: The following is our decision regarding Protest 1101-01-100116, dated March 21, 2001, filed by Agilent Technologies, Inc., against your classification of various glass vials used with chromatography equipment under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). FACTS: The articles at issue are crimp top, round- and tapered-bottomed glass vials. The protestant provided the following technical information concerning the articles:

Multirole Turret; Protest 1101-01-100088

Reconsideration of NY I83652; Witch-shaped Pen on Cord; Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc. v. United States

African Growth and Opportunity Act; Findings and Trimmings; Lesser Developed Country; SwazilandDear Ms. Weiss:This is in response to your letter dated September 11, 2003, on behalf of your client Leonard Feinberg, Inc., requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of various women’s garments for preferential treatment preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). New York Ruling Letter (NY) J88484, issued October 3, 2003, addressed the eligibility of three styles of women’s garments (Styles 0725, 5322 and 0730). The issue of the eligibility of the remaining two styles (Styles 5342 and 5352) has been referred to our office for a direct response to you. Two sample garments were submitted to our office for our consideration. FACTS:At issue are two women’s knit garments. The first garment is a woman’s jacket, Style 5342. It is constructed from 60% cotton, 40% polyester knitted fabric. The jacket has a hood with a drawstring closure, a full front

African Growth and Opportunity Act; Findings and Trimmings; Lesser Developed Country; SwazilandDear Ms. Weiss:This is in response to your letter dated September 5, 2003, on behalf of your client, Leonard Feinberg, Inc., requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of five women’s garments for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Four of the garments have been ruled upon under NY J88417, dated October 3, 2003. The issue of the eligibility of the women’s shorts with embroidery on the back panels has been referred to this office for a direct response to you. A sample garment was submitted to our office for our consideration. FACTS:At issue is a pair of women’s shorts constructed from 60 percent cotton and 40 percent polyester knit fabric. The shorts, style number 50230, have an elasticized waistband with a drawstring, overlock stitching finishing the leg openings and an embroidered floral design across the back panels. The shorts contai

Withdrawals from Duty-Free Stores; 19 CFR §§ 19.6, 144.37, 148.85