Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
594 rulings found for “Ferry”
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-95-101104concerning country of origin marking of imported ladies trousers;Marking duties; 19 U.S.C. 1304(f); 19 CFR 134.51; 19 CFR 134.52; HRL 731775; HRL 734894; HRL 734585; HRL 734078; C.S.D. 92-32 (HRL734151)
Internal Advice No. 63/93; picture frames; calcium carbonate; plastic; 3924.90.20; laboratory report; NY 874122; GRI 1; GRI 3(b); essential character; EN 68.10;HRL 956788
Protest 2704-93-103119; Footwear; Sandal, strippy, women's; Uppers, external surface area; HRL 083879
Internal advice request; Drawback; 19 U.S.C 1313(j)(1); 19 U.S.C 1313(j)(2); Commercial Interchangeability; Polyester chips; Contaminated merchandise; Substitution unused merchandise; Direct identification unused merchandise
Protest No. 2704-95-100869; Clerical Error, Mistake of Fact, or other Inadvertence; 19 U.S.C. 1514; 19 U.S.C. 1520(c)(1) Dear Sir or Madam:
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2720/95-100748; Immediate delivery; 19 U.S.C. 1448(b); 19 CFR 142.21(g)
Protest 2720-95-101411; pullover jackets; "water resistant"; 19 U.S.C. 1514; 19 U.S.C. 1520(c)(1); 19 CFR 177.9(b)(2); HQs 75-0026, 955909; NY 876026
Application for Further Review of Protest Number 2704-95-101616 concerning the dutiability of alleged interest payments
Application for Further Review of Protest 2704-95-102099, dated June 28, 1995, Concerning Protective Gear for In-line Skating
Applicability of subheadings 9802.00.80 and 9802.00.90,HTSUS, to commingled garment accessories
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102661, filed September 26, 1994, concerning theclassification of a product called "Locket Surprise Kayla".
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102662, filed September 26, 1994, concerning theclassification of a product called "Locket Surprise Barbie".
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-94-102408, filedSeptember 1, 1994, concerning the classification of Poly PocketPencil Case Playset articles
Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-96-102971;injured rubber body parts/ props; ENs 95.05, 95.03; HRLs 955527,956553, 955758, 955529 and 088221; U. S. v. Topps Chewing Gum
Applications for further review of protests ##2704-92-100232 through 2704-92-100235 concerning the assessment of antidumping duties (ADD) and interest and deemed liquidation; Section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 611(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff and Trade Act of 1984; 19 U.S.C. 1504(d); Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 95-50 (March 23, 1995); ABC International Traders v. United States, CIT Slip. Op. 95-97(May 23, 1995).
Applications for further review of protests ##2704-92-100232 through 2704-92-100235 concerning the assessment of antidumping duties (ADD) and interest and deemed liquidation; Section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 611(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff and Trade Act of 1984; 19 U.S.C. §1504(d); Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 95-50 (March 23, 1995); ABC International Traders v. United States, CIT Slip. Op. 95-97(May 23, 1995).Dear Sir:This office has received the above-referenced applications for further review (AFR) of the protests as provided for under Customs regulations. We have considered the protests and have made the following decision. As these protests involve the same protestant, arise from the same set of transactions, and are identical in every way except for the individual entry numbers, we have consolidated our response to them into one ruling.FACTS:Entries were made between September 14, 1987 and July 26, 1988 on television sets fro
Protest 2704-96-100995; glass preserve jars; glass jars for conveyance or packing of liquids or of solid products; household glass storage articles; wire bail and rubber ring closure system; principal use; eo nominee; 7010.90.50; 7013.39.20; HRL 953282; HRL 088020; HRL 951721; HRL 956470; HRL 953952; T.D. 96-7; Myers v. United States, CIT Slip Op. 97-75; Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 17 CIT 226 (1993); Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United States, 938 F. Supp. 875 (CIT 1996)
Protest and Application for Further Review No. 2704-97-102936; Denial of drawback; mistake of fact, clerical error or inadvertence;19 U.S.C. 1520(c)(1)
Protest and Application for Further Review No. 2704-97-101997; Destruction of Merchandise
Protest 2704-94-101476; "Pop-Up Wackaroos"
Protest 2704-94-102815, "Barbie 100 Piece Gift Set"
Application for Further Review of Protest No.2704-96-100566;"Pocahontas Beauty Basket"
Protest 2704-94-101898; Teapot Necklace Surprise
Protest 2704-95-102693; Electronically activated doped zinc sulfides
Protest 2704-97-101880; Buffet Salad Set and Silver-platedTwo Tier Buffet Server; Subheading 7323.99.10; GRI 3(b);Explanatory Notes (VIII) and (X) to GRI 3(b); Explanatory Note70.13; Other Glassware of the Kind Used for Table, Office, IndoorDecoration or Similar Purposes; Other Table, Kitchen or OtherHousehold Articles of Iron or Steel; HQs 960620; 956048 and956810.
