Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
594 rulings found for “Ferry”
Protest No. 2704-89-001476; tint tank; 9013.90.40; EN 90.13; 8419.89.50; Note 2(e), Chapter 84; EN 84.19; heating secondary function; tinting principal function; EN 84.79
Response to request for Internal Advice; classification ofgloves; gloves specially designed for use in sports of subheading6216.00.08, HTSUSA v. other textile gloves of subheading6216.00.32, HTSUSA; Stonewall Trading Company v. United States, 64Cust. Ct. 482, C.D. 4023 (1970); reinforcement across middle ofglove where knuckles bend is a prerequisite; reinforcement need notbe of vinyl; HRL 082336 (11/21/88);
Protest No. 2704-93-102446; Hitch Pins; Section XVI, Note 2(a); Explanatory Note 73.18(D); Section XVI, Note 1(g); Additional U.S. Rule of Interpretation 1(c); Subchapter XVII, U.S. note 2(ij); 8432.90.00; 9817.00.50
Classification of certain men's garments; shirt v. jacket; 6201, HTSUSA v. 6205, HTSUSA; Protest 2704-93-102792
Further review of protest #2704-91-102694 concerning theassessment of anti-dumping duties (ADD) and countervailing duties(CVD) on a certain entry; 19 U.S.C. 1504; Nunn Bush and Weyco Group,Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 92-9 (February 5, 1992).
Broker Employer/Employee Relationship; Employment by more than one broker; 19 U.S.C. 1641; 19 CFR 111.11(d)
Request for Internal Advice concerning a licensed brokerqualifying a licence and permit for one broker and being employedby a second broker; 19 U.S.C. 1641; 19 CFR 111.11; 19 CFR111.19(d); C.S.D. 91-12 (March 8, 1991); Customs ruling 221724(June 4, 1991).
Protest 2704-93-103738; specially tempered glassware; 19 U.S.C.1520(c)(1); liquidation of entry is not an error or mistake whenthe existence of instructions is unknown to a Customs officialunless this lack of knowledge caused an error or mistake inliquidation.
Further review of protest #2704-91-102697 concerning theassessment of anti-dumping duties (ADD) and countervailing duties(CVD) on a certain entry; 19 U.S.C. 1504; Nunn Bush and WeycoGroup, Inc. v. United States, CIT slip op. 92-9 (February 5,1992).
Application for Further Review of Protest Number 2704-93- 102342 concerning sale for export of merchandise imported pursuant to a tiered sales agreement
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2720-93- 101191; concerning the applicability of subheading 9801.00.10, HTSUS, to Ray Ban sunglasses
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2704-92-103114 concerningcountry of origin marking on computer software and computer mouse units; 19U.S.C. 1304(f).
Country of Origin Marking for Maps; Ultimate Purchaser; 19 CFR 134.1(d).
Protest 2704-92-103393; Shimatronic Design System; Drawing Instrument; Chapter 90, Note 3; Section XVI, Notes 1(m) and 4; Explanatory Note 90.17; NY 848655; HQs 953922, 955426, 082127, 086126, and 086082; 8471.92.40
Protest No. 2720-93-100562; surgical ophthalmic microscope; compound optical microscope; EN 90.11; heading 9018; GRI 3(a); HQs 085754, 088121, 954362, 956638
Protest No. 2704-93-102469; Commercial Front Mowers; EN 84.33;HRL 952244, 066221
Protest No. 2704-93-101951; Telco Simplex; Keyboards; Combined Input/Output Units; Chapter 84, Note 5(B); HQ 950679; 8471.92.20; 8471.90.90
Application for Further Review of Protest 2704-93-102286. Engraving rubber.
Protest 2704-93-103276; micro silica sand; EN 26.20; 2621.00.00; EN 26.21; 6815.99.44; EN 68.15
NYRL 876026 (9/14/92) affirmed; a ruling letter will be appliedto subsequent transactions only if the articles the subject of thelater importations are identical to the merchandise classified inthe original ruling; 19 CFR 177.9(b); applicability of a ruling toa transaction is contingent on the facts; absent a showing thatCustoms failed to utilize proper testing procedures, a presumptionexists that the Customs laboratory results are correct; Exxon Corp.v. United States, 462 F. Supp. 378, 81 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 4772(October 16, 1978); Customs lab results control classification anddetermine applicability of previously issued rulings.
Parts of Shuttle Tankers; Forebody; Midbody; Stern with Vessel House; Stern without Vessel House; Other Floating Structures; Structure of Iron or Steel; Unassembled Goods; GRI 2(a)
PRD 2704-93-102874; Microwave Oven Component for Combination Microwave/Convection Oven; Unfinished Microwave Oven, GRI 2(a); Subheading 8516.60.40, Cooking Stoves, Ranges and Ovens; 8516.90.20, Parts of Cooking Stoves, Ranges and Ovens; Section XVI, Note 2(a); HQ 083850, HQ 953456, HQ 952019
Protest 2704-93-102563; Multi-faceted octagonal shaped glasscontainers; U.S. Additional Note 1(a); EN 70.10; HRL 087359
PRD 2720-94-100204; Mirror for Airplane Lavatory, Heading 8306; HQ 953138, Section XV, Note 1(h); Parts of Airplanes or Helicopters, Subheading 8803.30.00, Civil Aircraft Agreement (CAA), Section XVII, Note 2(d), Prisms, Mirrors and Other Optical Elements, 9001.90.60, Chapter 90, Note 1(d) Dear Sir:
Inclusion of rejected, scrapped, and lost components as assists; Modification of HRL 543093; Section 402(h)(1)(A) of the TAA; 19 CFR 152.103(d)(1) and (e)(1)
