Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
41,119 rulings found for “HQ”
Eligibility for UAFTA Preference for canned salmon
Eligibility of Duty Exemption under HTSUS Subheading 9811.00.60 to Sample Footwear
Eligibility of wooden reels for a duty exemption under HTSUS subheading 9801.00.10
Eligibility of imported computer memory chips for a partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.80, HTSUS
Sale for Export
Revocation of New York Ruling Letter (NY) R01069, dated December 8,2004; Classification of antimony trisulphide.
Application for Further Review of Protest 4101-05-100142 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4101-05-100142, timely filed by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, on behalf of its client, Tru Mold Shoes Inc. FACTS: The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification and liquidation of one entry of custom made-to-measure orthopedic footwear under subheading 6403.59.9061 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA).
IA #05/009; Classification and IRT on Vinegar Stock
Application for Further Review of Protest 4101-05-100247 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4101-05-100247, filed by Degussa Initiators, Inc. The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) rate advance on nine entries of "CH-50-WO" under subheading 3815.90.5000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) L86768, dated August 10, 2005; classification of Flower Bracelet, Flower Necklace and Bouquet Basket from China
Protest and Application for Further Review (AFR) 1601-04-100386Dear Sir or Madam:
Request for reconsideration of NY 850884; Rhodorsil Emulsion 872. Dear Ms. Bahr:
Protest 2605-04-100013; Moisture Separator for Steam Generators
Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 4601-05-102639; 19 U.S.C. §1515(c); 19 C.F.R. §174.24 Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This is in reply to your request of January 3, 2006, on behalf of your client, Age Group Ltd. ("Age Group"), for U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of Age Group’s Application for Further Review ("AFR") of Protest No. 4601-05-102639. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial.
Classification of stainless steel measuring spoon set; revocation of NY B86306
Sports medallions from Italy and Taiwan; revocation of NY A81489
Brass medallion from China; revocation of NY J86623
Classification of VICTREX® PEEK™ polymer
Modification of NY B87809; Leica DISTO laser distance meter
Classification of two three-piece infants’ sets packaged together
19 U.S.C. § 1466; Modification
Request for Binding Trademark Infringement Ruling Submitted on Behalf of Reef Runner Tackle Co., Inc.; Fishing Lure configuration trademark; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Registration No. 2,491,908 [U.S. Customs and Border Protection Recordation No. TMK 05-00421].
Request for Internal Advice; subheading 9801.00.10 treatment for socks boarded overseas
Express Consignment Carriers; U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement
Request for Internal Advice; Subheading 9802.00.80 requirements
