Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
41,119 rulings found for “HQ”
Modification of NY G85500; Tool Caddy; Tool Organizer; Heading 4202; Rooster Products, Inc. v. United States, decided June 1, 2000, Slip. Op. 2000-60 (Ct. Int’l Trade)
Revocation of NY J81807; Garden Bucket Organizer; Heading 4202; Rooster Products, Inc. v. United States, decided June 1, 2000, Slip. Op. 2000-60 (Ct. Int’l Trade)
Protest 4601-03-103443; Spring-operated mechanism for high voltage circuit breakers
Revocation of NY 873105; Radar apparatus
Revocation of NY I81109; Zinc-plated steel compression fittings from India
Revocation of NY A82216; Zinc couplings and connectors from Russia
Application for Further Review of Protest 3901-03-102295Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 3901-03-102295, filed by Anchor Glass Container Corporation.
New York Ruling Letter J89555; drink mix kits from China
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4701-04-100069; the tariff classification of certain women’s 100% cotton knit top
Modification of Port Decision Letter (PD) A88686, dated November 18, 1996; Classification of sleeveless upper body garments; Heading 6211
Modification of New York Ruling Letter (NY) B89011, dated September 26, 1997; Classification of sleeveless upper body garments; Heading 6211
Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) K81070, dated December 4, 2003, regarding classification of rice preparations from England
Protest 4701-04-100032; Beta-Tab® 20%
Spring Hinge
NY J89597 Affirmed; SmartScope®; Integrated Digital Camera Riflescope
Magnesium Oxide Crystal wafers weighing less than 2.5 grams
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4102-04-10018; the tariff classification of industrial food slicers from Italy and China
Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No.’s 5201-04-100110, 5201-04-100111, 5201-04-100112, 5201-04-100113, 5201-04-100109; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24Dear Mr. Fee:This is in reply to your request of June 1, 2004, on behalf of your client, Rives Apparel International, LLC., for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No.’s: 5201-04-100110, 5201-04-100111, 5201-04-100112, 5201-04-100113, and 5201-04-100109. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS:The five protests at issue are against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of five entries of men’s overalls and pants under subheadings 6203.42.2010, 6203.42.4015 and 6204.62.4020 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Protest 3001-03-100191; plastic light clips
Protest 3004-04-100038; Tin-Free Steel in Coils; 201 Steel Safeguard Duty Exclusion
Protest 4601-04-101035; jumbo corn skewer sets
Classification of a Viper Bag and Pouch Opener; Reconsideration of K82693
Review of denial of Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-04-101862; 19 U.S.C. §1515(c)
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-04-101375; the tariff classification of "3-ring Binder Carryalls."
Protest Number 2704-03-1011804; Buying Commissions