Base
R000802004-02-10New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a bracket from China

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

8302.50.0000

$77.7M monthly imports

Compare All →

Federal Register

1 doc

Related notices & rules

Court Cases

2 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

22 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-01 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of a bracket from China

Ruling Text

NY R00080 February 10, 2004 CLA-2-83:RR:NC:N1:113 R00080 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 8302.50.0000 Mr. Leslie J. Cummings Knape & Vogt Manufacturing Company 2700 Oak Industrial Drive, N.E. Grand Rapids, MI 49505 RE: The tariff classification of a bracket from China Dear Mr. Cummings: In your letter dated January 19, 2004, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The merchandise is a rear-mounting bracket made of zinc-plated, base metal. (item number 8401). The bracket will be used in the installation of a pair of side mount drawer slides in cabinetry. The applicable subheading for the bracket will be 8302.50.0000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for hat-racks, hat pegs, brackets and similar fixtures, and parts thereof. The rate of duty will be free. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist James Smyth at 646-733-3018. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Federal Register (2)

Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.