Base
N0291872008-06-12New York

The tariff classification of a plastic funnel from China.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

3926.90.9980

Compare All →

Court Cases

4 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

18 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-11-05 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification of a plastic funnel from China.

Ruling Text

N029187 June 13, 2008 CLA-2-39:OT:RR:E:NC:SP:221 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 3926.90.9980 Mr. Troy D. Crago Atico International USA, Inc. 501 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 RE: The tariff classification of a plastic funnel from China. Dear Mr. Crago: In your letter dated May 23, 2008, you requested a tariff classification ruling. A photograph was provided with your letter. The funnel (A002AA00451) is composed of molded polypropylene plastic. It measures 10 inches by 7.68 inches by 4.53 inches and has a long, flexible spout. The funnel will be marketed by your automotive division. The applicable subheading for the plastic funnel will be 3926.90.9980, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for other articles of plastics, other. The rate of duty will be 5.3 percent ad valorem. Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Joan Mazzola at 646-733-3023. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.