Base
H864582002-01-14New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of footwear from China

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6404.19.20

$300.8M monthly imports

Compare All →

Federal Register

1 doc

Related notices & rules

Court Cases

3 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

24 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-02 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of footwear from China

Ruling Text

NY H86458 January 14, 2002 CLA-2-64:RR:NC:347:H86458 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6404.19.20 Mr. John Pellegrini Ross & Hardies 65 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022-3219 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Pellegrini: In your letter dated December 17, 2001, you requested a tariff classification ruling for a sample of footwear identified as Model 11892B on behalf of North Walk, Ltd. You describe the merchandise which is the subject of this ruling request as a woman’s mid-calf cold weather boot with a rubber/plastic outsole. The upper is made of “vilon” a plastic material, and leather laminated to a man-made fiber fleece fabric. You state that the upper consists of three materials, rubber/plastic, leather and textile. However only rubber/plastic and textile is tactile and visible on the external surface of the boot’s upper. You contend that the boot has an upper of leather and the textile material should be viewed as accessory or reinforcement per Note 4(a), Chapter 64, Harmonized tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS). This contention is based upon your interpretation of Hi-Tech Sports USA v. United States; Slip-Op 96-139 dated August 16, 1996. In that decision, leather overlays atop a textile upper were considered external surface area of the upper by the court because they were lasted under and cemented to the outer sole thereby contributing structural strength to the shoe. You state that since the “flannel overlays” on the subject footwear are not lasted and do not contribute to the structural integrity of the upper, they are not considered part of the external surface area of the upper. In general, the external surface area of the upper (ESAU) for footwear classification is taken to be the constituent material having the greatest external surface area, no account being taken of accessories or reinforcements such as ankle patches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or similar attachments. In addition, factors such as visibility, material plausibility, completeness and structure are evaluated for ESAU determinations when footwear uppers consist of multiple materials. It is the opinion of this office that the external textile material imparts the ESAU for Model 11892B in terms of visibility, plausibility, completeness and structure. Textile and rubber/plastic are the only materials visible on the surface of the upper. The leather backing for the textile material is not visible anywhere on the surface of the upper. The textile is also not like the examples of accessories and reinforcements mentioned in Note 4 (a), Chapter 64 HTS. Since the textile material is the constituent material having the greatest external surface area of the upper for Model 11892B, classification for the boot is appropriate in subheading 6404 HTS. The applicable subheading for the model 11892B will be 6404.19.20 (HTS), which provides for footwear with outer soles of rubber/plastics and uppers of textile, footwear designed to be worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. The general rate of duty will be 37.5 percent ad valorem. The submitted sample is not marked with the country of origin. The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist, Richard Foley at 646-733-3042. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Related Rulings for HTS 6404.19.20

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Federal Register (1)

Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (3)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.