Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b).

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20229 U.S. Customs and Border Protection HQ H298793 July 9, 2018 VES-3-02 OT:RR:BSTC:CCR H298793 TNA CATEGORY: Carriers Mr. Shaun Hughes Maersk Line Limited 41448 Avenida Conchita Murrieta, CA 92562 RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Dear Mr. Hughes: This is in response to your correspondence of July 9, 2018, in which you inquire about the coastwise transportation of the two individuals mentioned therein aboard the M/V MAERSK CHICAGO. Our decision follows. FACTS: The voyage in question involves the transportation of the subject individuals aboard the non-coastwise-qualified M/V MAERSK CHICAGO (“the vessel”). The individuals will embark the vessel in Houston, Texas on or about August 8, 2018, and will disembark in Norfolk, Virginia on or about August 15, 2018. You state that the individuals are the spouse and son of the Master of the subject vessel. ISSUE: Whether the individuals described in the FACTS section are “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). LAW AND ANALYSIS: Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.” The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103 which provides: (a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel- (1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in coastwise trade; and (2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. Section 4.50(b) of the Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Regulations provides: A passenger within the meaning of this part is any person carried on a vessel who is not connected with the operation of the vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business. Section 4.80(b)(2) of the CBP Regulations provides: The penalty imposed for the unlawful transportation of passengers between coastwise points is $300 for each passenger so transported and landed on or before November 2, 2015, and $778 for each passenger so transported and landed after November 2, 2015 (46 U.S.C. § 55103, as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015). In the present case, you state that the individuals are the spouse and daughter of the Captain of the subject vessel. It is CBP’s longstanding position that the spouse and children of officers of a vessel are not passengers for purposes of the passenger coastwise statute. See General Letter No. 117 (May 20, 1916) from the former Bureau of Navigation. The Master is an “officer of a vessel.” Therefore, the Master’s immediate family members, may be aboard a non-coastwise-qualified vessel during a coastwise voyage and are not “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Accordingly, the coastwise transportation of the individuals in question would not be in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. HOLDING: The individuals described in the FACTS section above are not “passengers” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Therefore, the coastwise transportation of such individuals would not be in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Sincerely, Lisa L. Burley Chief/Supervisory Attorney-Advisor Cargo Security, Carriers and Restricted Merchandise Branch Office of Trade, Regulations and Rulings