Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b).

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20229 U.S. Customs and Border Protection HQ H272001 January 12, 2016 VES-3-02 OT:RR:BSTC:CCR HQ H272001 KLQ CATEGORY: Carriers Mr. William Dutour Maersk Line Limited One Commercial Place, 20th Floor Norfolk, VA 23510 RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Dear Mr. Dutour: This is in response to your correspondence of January 12, 2015, in which you inquire about the coastwise transportation of the one individual mentioned therein aboard the M/V MAERSK MEMPHIS. Our decision follows. FACTS The voyage in question involves the transportation of the subject individual aboard the non-coastwise-qualified M/V MAERSK MEMPHIS (“the vessel”). The individual will embark the vessel in Newark, New Jersey on or about January 25, 2016 and will disembark in Houston, Texas on about February 3, 2016. The individual is the father of the chief mate of the subject vessel. ISSUE Whether the individual described in the FACTS section is a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). LAW and ANALYSIS Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.” The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103 which provides: (a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel- (1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in coastwise trade; and (2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. (b) Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed. Section 4.50 (b) of the Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Regulations provide: A passenger within the meaning of this part is any person carried on a vessel who is not connected with the operation of the vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business. In the present case, you state that the individual is the father of the chief mate of the subject vessel. It is CBP’s longstanding position that the spouse and children of officers of a vessel are not passengers for purposes of the passenger coastwise statute. The chief mate is an “officer of a vessel.” However, our definition of immediate family members does not extend to the parents of a vessel officer. Therefore, the chief mate’s father is a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Accordingly, the coastwise transportation of the subject individual would be in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. HOLDING The individual described in the FACTS section above is a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Therefore, the coastwise transportation of such individual would be in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Sincerely, Lisa L. Burley Chief/Supervisory Attorney-Advisor Cargo Security, Carriers and Restricted Merchandise Branch Office of International Trade, Regulations and Rulings