Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b)

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20229 U.S. Customs and Border Protection HQ H257958 October 8, 2014 VES-3-02-OT:RR:BSTC:CCR HQ H257958 WRB CATEGORY: Carriers Mr. Bryan Mason Southport, Agencies, Inc. 2700 Lake Villa Drive Suite 180 Metairie, LA 70002 RE: Coastwise Transportation; 46 U.S.C. § 55103; 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b) Dear Mr. Mason: This letter is in response to your correspondence of October 7, 2014, with respect to the coastwise transportation of one individual. Our ruling is set forth below. FACTS: You ask whether one individual may be transported on the non-coastwise-qualified M/V LETO (the “vessel”). The subject individual will embark the vessel at New Orleans, Louisiana, on or about October 6, 2014, and disembark at Mobile, Alabama, on or about October 11, 2014. The subject individual is the spouse of the vessel’s Chief Officer. ISSUE: Whether the subject individual is a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 CFR § 4.50(b)? LAW AND ANALYSIS: Generally, the coastwise laws prohibit the transportation of passengers or merchandise between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws in any vessel other than a vessel built in, documented under the laws of, and owned by citizens of the United States. Such a vessel, after it has obtained a coastwise endorsement from the U.S. Coast Guard, is said to be “coastwise qualified.” The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the territorial sea, which is defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline. The coastwise law applicable to the carriage of passengers is found in 46 U.S.C. § 55103 (recodified by Pub. L. 109-304, enacted on October 6, 2006) and provides that: (a) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or chapter 121 of this title, a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel- (1) is wholly owned by citizens of the United States for purposes of engaging in the coastwise trade; and (2) has been issued a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 or is exempt from documentation but would otherwise be eligible for such a certificate and endorsement. (b) Penalty. The penalty for violating subsection (a) is $300 for each passenger transported and landed. In the present case, you state that the subject individual is the spouse of the vessel’s Chief Officer. Under the regulations promulgated under the authority of 19 U.S.C. § 55103, a “passenger” is defined as it is under 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b), which provides that a passenger is “any person carried aboard a vessel who is not connected with the operation of such vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business.” See 19 C.F.R. § 4.80a(a)(5). In this regard, persons transported on a vessel would be passengers unless they were “directly and substantially” connected with the operation, navigation, ownership, or business of that vessel itself. See Cust. Bull., Vol. 36, No. 23, p. 50 (June 5, 2002). It is CBP’s longstanding position that the spouse and children of officers of a vessel are not passengers for purposes of the passenger coastwise statute. See General Letter No. 117 (May 20, 1916) from the former Bureau of Navigation. A chief officer qualifies as an “officer of a vessel,” therefore, the spouse of the vessel’s chief officer may be aboard a non-coastwise-qualified vessel during a coastwise voyage and is not a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). See HQ H007256 (Feb. 26, 2007); HQ H020279, (Nov. 30, 2007). Consequently, the coastwise transportation of the subject individual is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. HOLDING The subject individual is not a “passenger” within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 55103 and 19 C.F.R. § 4.50(b). Therefore, the coastwise transportation of such individual is not in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 55103. Sincerely, Lisa L. Burley Supervisory Attorney-Advisor/Chief Cargo Security, Carriers and Restricted Merchandise Branch Office of International Trade, Regulations & Rulings U.S. Customs and Border Protection