Base
D877031999-03-03New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a Jack-O-Lantern hanging.Dear Mr. Epstein:In your letter dated February 4, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling in behalf of your client, Avon Products, Inc., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York for a polyvinyl chloride hanging in the shape of a jack-o-lantern to be imported from ChinaThe item measures approximately 35 inches in width by 24 inches in height. It features sewn on depictions of a jack-o-lantern?s eyes, nose, mouth and stem. The article will incorporate LED lights as part of the depiction of the jack-o-lantern?s eyes. A voice chip will be housed in a small pouch sewn to the back of the hanging. The item has two loops for hanging from a pole.While you refer to the item as a ?flag?, it does not incorporate a design or pattern on both sides and would not, therefore, qualify as such. The imported item is more appropriately a ?wall hanging? which is a pumpkin incorporating the face of a jack-o-lantern which is an accept

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

9505.90.6000

Compare All →

Court Cases

9 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

27 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-06-20 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification of a Jack-O-Lantern hanging.Dear Mr. Epstein:In your letter dated February 4, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling in behalf of your client, Avon Products, Inc., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York for a polyvinyl chloride hanging in the shape of a jack-o-lantern to be imported from ChinaThe item measures approximately 35 inches in width by 24 inches in height. It features sewn on depictions of a jack-o-lantern?s eyes, nose, mouth and stem. The article will incorporate LED lights as part of the depiction of the jack-o-lantern?s eyes. A voice chip will be housed in a small pouch sewn to the back of the hanging. The item has two loops for hanging from a pole.While you refer to the item as a ?flag?, it does not incorporate a design or pattern on both sides and would not, therefore, qualify as such. The imported item is more appropriately a ?wall hanging? which is a pumpkin incorporating the face of a jack-o-lantern which is an accept

Ruling Text

PD D87703 March 3, 1999 CLA-2-95:CO:CH:D12 D87703 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 9505.90.6000 Mr. Arlen T. Epstein Tompkins & Davidson, LLP Counselors at Law One Astor Plaza 1515 Broadway New York, N.Y. 10036-8901 RE: The tariff classification of a Jack-O-Lantern hanging. Dear Mr. Epstein: In your letter dated February 4, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling in behalf of your client, Avon Products, Inc., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York for a polyvinyl chloride hanging in the shape of a jack-o-lantern to be imported from China The item measures approximately 35 inches in width by 24 inches in height. It features sewn on depictions of a jack-o-lantern?s eyes, nose, mouth and stem. The article will incorporate LED lights as part of the depiction of the jack-o-lantern?s eyes. A voice chip will be housed in a small pouch sewn to the back of the hanging. The item has two loops for hanging from a pole. While you refer to the item as a ?flag?, it does not incorporate a design or pattern on both sides and would not, therefore, qualify as such. The imported item is more appropriately a ?wall hanging? which is a pumpkin incorporating the face of a jack-o-lantern which is an accepted symbol of Halloween . Your sample is being returned under separate cover. The applicable subheading for the jack-o-lantern hanging will be 9505.90.6000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for ?Festive, carnival or other entertainment articles.... Other: Other.? The rate of duty will be free. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Robert Parsons Port Director Chicago, Illinois

Related Rulings for HTS 9505.90.60.00

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.