Base
C820881997-12-15New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a trailer body shell from Mexico

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

8716.90.5060

$100.0M monthly imports

Compare All →

Federal Register

2 docs

Related notices & rules

Ruling Age

28 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, Federal Register · As of 2026-04-30 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of a trailer body shell from Mexico

Ruling Text

NY C82088 December 15, 1997 CLA-2-87:RR:NC:1:101 C82088 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 8716.90.5060 Mr. Jess R. Burgos Regency Industries, Inc. 2335 Roll Drv. Suite 327 San Ysidro, CA 92173 RE: The tariff classification of a trailer body shell from Mexico Dear Mr. Burgos: In your letter dated December 5, 1997, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The item concerned (shown below) is the fiberglass shell of a BURRO Travel Trailer. The shells will be either 13' or 17' long. The item will be manufactured by Regency Industries, Inc. of Blue Jay, California in Tijuana, Mexico and imported by them through the Port of Otay Mesa, California. The applicable subheading for the trailer body shell will be 8716.90.5060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for Trailers . . . : Parts: Other: Other. The rate of duty will be 3.1% ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Robert DeSoucey at 212-466-5667. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Federal Register (1)

Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (2)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.