Base
B854111997-05-23New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of footwear from China.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6402.99.18

Compare All →

Court Cases

1 case

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

28 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-15 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification of footwear from China.

Ruling Text

NY B85411 May 23, 1997 CLA-2-64:RR:NC:347 B85411 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6402.99.18 Mr. Erik D. Smithweiss Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman LLP 245 Park Avenue 33rd Floor New York, NY 10167-4000 RE: The tariff classification of footwear from China. Dear Mr. Smithweiss: In your letter dated May 6, 1997 you requested a classification ruling on behalf of your client, E.S. Originals, Inc. for a girls plastic shoe. You have submitted a shoe, style JI 007-0 which you state is a girl's shoe with a plastic upper and plastic sole. It is held to the foot by a buckled strap over the in-step. The shoe features a textile bow attached to the top of the shoe with minimal stitching. You suggest that the bow is a loosely attached appurtenance which should be disregarded when determining the external surface area of the upper(ESAU) for tariff classification purposes. Loosely attached appurtenances are not considered to be part of the upper, therefore they are not included nor added back when measuring ESAU. In determining whether or not an item is a loosely attached appurtenance, among other things, we look to see if it is loosely attached, (i.e. secured by minimal stitching or a single rivet or tack), if it is not functional (added only for it's decorative qualities) and if it can be removed without making the shoe unserviceable. In this regard the bow attached to style JI 007-0 is considered a loosely attached appurtenance and is not included nor added back when measuring the ESAU. The applicable subheading for style JI 007-0 will be 6402.99.18, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, (HTS) which provides for footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastic, not covering the ankle, having uppers of which over 90 percent of the external surface area (including accessories and reinforcements) is rubber or plastic, other. The rate of duty will be 6 percent ad valorem. The submitted sample is not marked with the country of origin. Therefore, if imported as is, it will not meet the country of origin marking requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Accordingly, the footwear would be considered not legally marked under the provisions of 19 C.F.R. 134.11 which states, "every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article." This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding this ruling, contact National Import Specialist, Richard Foley at (212) 466-5890. Sincerely, Paul K. Schwartz Chief, Textiles and Apparel Branch National Commodity Specialist Division

Related Rulings for HTS 6402.99.18

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.