Base
8612151991-04-05New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of a man's hiking shoe and aplastic thermometer/compass on a chain. Dear Mr. Powell: In your letter dated March 6, 199l, on behalf of your clientL.A. Gear, Inc., you requested a classification ruling. The submitted sample is a man's casual walking/hiking shoe,style #4031, with a predominately leather upper, a five eyeletlace closure with two sets of color coordinated shoe laces, and acemented-on, multi-layered rubber/plastic high traction outersole.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 2 HTS codes referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

6403.99.60

Compare All →

Federal Register

3 docs

Related notices & rules

Court Cases

1 case

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

35 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Federal Register, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-21 · Updates real-time

Summary

The tariff classification of a man's hiking shoe and aplastic thermometer/compass on a chain. Dear Mr. Powell: In your letter dated March 6, 199l, on behalf of your clientL.A. Gear, Inc., you requested a classification ruling. The submitted sample is a man's casual walking/hiking shoe,style #4031, with a predominately leather upper, a five eyeletlace closure with two sets of color coordinated shoe laces, and acemented-on, multi-layered rubber/plastic high traction outersole.

Ruling Text

NY 861215 April 5, 1991 CLA-2-64:S:N:N3D:347 T 861215 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 6403.99.60; 9025.11.4000 Mr. Barry E. Powell Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman 707 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 5320 Los Angeles, California 90017 RE: The tariff classification of a man's hiking shoe and a plastic thermometer/compass on a chain. Dear Mr. Powell: In your letter dated March 6, 199l, on behalf of your client L.A. Gear, Inc., you requested a classification ruling. The submitted sample is a man's casual walking/hiking shoe, style #4031, with a predominately leather upper, a five eyelet lace closure with two sets of color coordinated shoe laces, and a cemented-on, multi-layered rubber/plastic high traction outer sole. Attached to the shoe by a metal chain, is a combination liquid filled thermometer and a compass, both encapsulated in clear plastic. While not precision instruments, both items are functional and are viewed as separate and distinct items from the shoe. In that neither the thermometer nor the compass can be determined to provide the essential character of the composite article, we would rely on GRI 3(c) (General Rules of Interpretation) to determine the classification. Direction finding compasses are provided for under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule provision 9014.1090, while thermometers are covered under 9025.11.40 (HTS). Therefore, in accordance with rule 3(c), we would classify this article under 9025.11.4000, HTS, the heading which occurs last in numerical order. We are returning your sample as you requested. The applicable subheading for the man's shoe, style #4031 will be 6403.99.60, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for certain footwear in Chapter 64. The rate of duty will be 8.5 percent ad valorem. The applicable subheading for the combination article, a thermometer and compass on a chain, will be 9025.11.4000, HTS, which provides for thermometers, liquid-filled, for direct reading, other than clinical. The rate of duty will be 8.4 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section l77 of the Customs Regulations (l9 C.F.R. 177). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction. Sincerely, Jean F. Maguire Area Director New York Seaport

Related Rulings for HTS 6403.99.60

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.

Federal Register (3)

Trade notices, proposed rules, and final rules related to the tariff codes in this ruling.

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.