U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database
Court Cases
1 case
CIT & Federal Circuit
Ruling Age
35 years
Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-05-18 · Updates real-time
Cleaning in preparation of repairs; damage survey Vessel: Barge JOVALAN Date of Arrival: August 10, 1989 Port of Arrival: Long Beach, CA Vessel Repair Entry No. C27-0075267-1
HQ 110805 July 25, 1990 VES-13-18-CO:R:P:C 110805 KVS CATEGORY: Carriers Chief, Technical Branch Commercial Operations Division Suite 705 One World Trade Center Long Beach, CA 90831-0700 RE: Cleaning in preparation of repairs; damage survey Vessel: Barge JOVALAN Date of Arrival: August 10, 1989 Port of Arrival: Long Beach, CA Vessel Repair Entry No. C27-0075267-1 Dear Sir: This is in response to your memorandum of January 19, 1990, which forwards for our consideration an application for vessel repair entry C27-0075267-1. Our findings are set forth below. FACTS: The JOVALAN, an unmanned barge engaged in the transportation of crude oil, underwent a series of inspections and shipyard operations at Ensenada, Mexico, which were accomplished in two different calls to that port. Although the documents submitted by the applicant contain a discrepancy as to the dates of those calls, American Bureau of Shipping records indicate that the calls were made between the dates of June 23, 1989 and September 15, 1989. American Bureau of Shipping invoice nos. 692100 and 692101 indicate that the following services were rendered: 1) annual survey of hull; 2) annual load line inspection; 3) load line certificate renewal; 4) special (damage) survey of hull no. 2; and 5) damage survey of cargo tank no. 1. In the case under consideration, the JOVALAN departed Ensenada on August 8, 1989, arriving at Long Beach on August 10, 1989. On October 6, 1989, the applicant requested an extension of time in which to file an application for relief, which was granted. An application for relief was timely filed on November 9, 1989. The application and supporting documentation was forwarded to Headquarters for our review and ruling as to the dutiability of the cost of "oily water removal and tank cleaning for inspection" listed on Astilleros Unidos de Ensenada, S.A. de C.V. invoice no. 6842. - 2 - ISSUE: Whether the cost of oily water removal and tank cleaning undertaken in preparation for a damage survey is dutiable under 19 U.S.C. 1466. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Title 19, United States Code, section 1466, provides, in pertinent part, for payment of duty in the amount of 50 percent ad valorem on the costs of foreign repairs to vessels documented under the laws of the United States to engage in the foreign or coastwise trade, or vessels intended to be employed in such trade. The Customs Service has long taken the position that cleaning is not dutiable unless performed in preparation for, or as an integral part of repairs. See C.I.E. 51/61 (see also C.I.E. 18/48; C.I.E. 125/48; C.I.E. 820/60; C.I.E. 698/62). In the case under consideration, an examination of American Bureau of Shipping documents reveals that, in addition to the special periodical survey of the hull, a damage survey of the cargo tanks was also performed. Therefore, cleaning was not undertaken "for inspection purposes only", as is alleged by the applicant, but was also undertaken to determine what repairs were necessary. The cleaning and removal of oily water from the tank to allow the assessment of necessary repairs is clearly cleaning done in preparation of repairs within the meaning of C.I.E. 51/61. Accordingly, the cost is dutiable. Sincerely, B. James Fritz Chief Carrier Rulings Branch
CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.