Surface Transportation Board
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. NOR 38302S; Docket No. NOR 38376S] On December 1, 2025, the United States Department of Energy and the United States Department of Defense (the Government) and CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX) (collectively, Movants), jointly filed a motion seeking Board approval of a proposed settlement agreement (CSX Settlement Agreement or Agreement) that would resolve the above-captioned rate reasonableness disputes as between them only. Movants also seek a prescription of the rates and rate update methodologies, and maximum revenue-to-variable cost (R/VC) ratios established for the commodities and services that are the subjects of the Agreement. At Movants' request, notice of the CSX Settlement Agreement was served and published in the Federal Register ( 91 FR 10179 ) on March 2, 2026. In the notice, the Board solicited comments on the Agreement. No comments were filed. As discussed more fully below, the Board will grant the motion, approve the Agreement, and prescribe the Agreement's rates and rate update methodologies and maximum R/VC ratios. Background In March 1981, the Government filed these complaints against 21 railroads (the Railroad Defendants) under section 229 of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Public Law 96-448, 94 Stat. 1895. The Government sought reparations and a rate prescription relating to the nationwide movement of spent nuclear fuel, other high-level radioactive wastes, and the empty containers (casks) and buffer and escort cars u…
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al.; United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, et al.
United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al.; United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, et al.
United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al.; United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, et al.
United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al.; and United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, et al.
United States Department of Energy and United States Department of Defense v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, et al. and Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company, et al.
Citation: 91 FR 50593