United States et al. v. Constellation Energy Corporation, Inc. et al. Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h) , that the Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comment on the Proposed Final Judgment has been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America et al. v. Constellation Energy Corporation, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-04235. The United States' Response and the public comment received are reprinted below. Copies of the public comment ( printed page 22168) and the United States' Response are available for inspection on the Antitrust Division's website at http://www.justice.gov/​atr . Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA United States of America, and State of Texas, Plaintiffs, v. Constellation Energy Corporation, Calpine Corporation, and CPN CS Holdco Corp. Defendants. Case No. 1:25-cv-04235-ABJ Response of Plaintiff United States to Public Comment on the Proposed Final Judgment Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (the “Tunney Act”), 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h) , the United States submits this response to the one public comment received regarding the proposed Final Judgment in this case. After careful consideration of the only submitted comment, the United States continues to believe that the proposed Final Judgment is in the public interest …