Personnel Management Office
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is correcting a proposed rule that published in the February 24, 2026, issue of the Federal Register. The proposed rule contained missing FR citation information, and this corrects that error.
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Office of Personnel Management 5 CFR Part 430 [Docket ID OPM-2025-0273] RIN 3206-AP06 ( printed page 14654) AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is correcting a proposed rule that published in the February 24, 2026, issue of the Federal Register . The proposed rule contained missing FR citation information, and this corrects that error. DATES: This correction is effective on March 26, 2026. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Noah Peters, Senior Advisor to the Director, by email at employeeaccountability@opm.gov or by phone at (202) 606-2930. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the proposed rule “Performance Appraisal for General Schedule, Prevailing Rate, and Certain Other Employees” (Document Number 2026-03619), published at 91 FR 8780 on February 24, 2026, within the “Conforming Amendments” paragraph on page 8787, in the third column, the FR citation “90 FR xxxxx (MM, DD, YYYY)” is corrected to read “ 91 FR 10904 (March 5, 2026)”. This correction of the proposed rule provides readers with complete information that was missing from the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the proposed rule. Therefore, OPM has determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) , that prior notice and opportunity for public comment is unnecessary. Public comment could not inform this process in any meaningful way. We have further determined that, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) , the age…
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
Citation: 91 FR 14654
