Base
Notice2023-129482023-06-16

In the Matter of: Samet Doyduk, 32 E 10th Avenue, Runnemede, NJ 08078-1128; Order Denying Export Privileges

Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau

Document Excerpt

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security On July 12, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Samet Doyduk (“Doyduk”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371 . Specifically, Doyduk was convicted of conspiring to export firearm parts purchased in the United States to be shipped to Turkey and the Republic of Georgia. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Doyduk to 15 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release and $100 special assessment. Pursuant to section 1760(e) of the Export Control Reform Act (“ECRA”), [ 1 ] the export privileges of any person who has been convicted of certain offenses, including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 371 , may be denied for a period of up to ten (10) years from the date of his/her conviction. 50 U.S.C. 4819(e) . In addition, any Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) licenses or other authorizations issued under ECRA, in which the person had an interest at the time of the conviction, may be revoked. Id. BIS has received notice of Doyduk's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. 371 . The Regulations provide that before taking action to deny a person's export privileges under section 766.25, BIS shall provide the person written notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to comment through a written submission, “unless exceptional circumstances exist.” 15 CFR 766.25(b) . In this case, BIS made two unsuccessful attempts to serve Doydu

Read full document on FederalRegister.gov →

Full Document

Citation: 88 FR 39401