Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-570-827] AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain cased pencils (pencils) from the People's Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the level indicated in the “Final Results of Review” section of this notice. DATES: Applicable November 23, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4929. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the fifth sunset review of the Order   [ 1 ] on pencils from China pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). [ 2 ] On August 8, 15, and 16, 2022, respectively, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from the Dixon Ticonderoga Company (Dixon), Musgrave Pencil Company (Musgrave), and LaRose Industries LLC dba Cra-Z-Art (LaRose) (collectively, the domestic interested parties) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) . [ 3 ] These companies claimed interested party status under sec…