Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard
On February 13, 2020, the Coast Guard published a final rule on Navigation and Navigable Waters, and Shipping; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments for U.S. Coast Guard Field Districts 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 17. Effective March 16, 2020, that rule removed a security zone regulation when only the section heading for that regulation needed to be amended. This document corrects that error.
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Homeland Security Coast Guard 33 CFR 165 [Docket No. USCG-2018-0533] AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Correcting amendments. SUMMARY: On February 13, 2020, the Coast Guard published a final rule on Navigation and Navigable Waters, and Shipping; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments for U.S. Coast Guard Field Districts 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 17. Effective March 16, 2020, that rule removed a security zone regulation when only the section heading for that regulation needed to be amended. This document corrects that error. DATES: Effective August 10, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dominique Christianson, Coast Guard, telephone 202-372-3856 or fax 202-372-8405. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction On February 13, 2020 the Coast Guard published a rule in the Federal Register ( 85 FR 8169 ), effective on March 16, 2020. Subsequent review of the rule revealed that it removed a security zone regulation, 33 CFR 165.809 , when the only change needed was to amend the section heading for that regulation. Page 85 FR 8170 of the rule referred to a 2005 proposed rule ( 70 FR 9363 ) as support for removing the security zones in § 165.809, but that NPRM only proposed to “remove the Port of Port Lavaca-Point Comfort security zone.” And the final rule ( 70 FR 39176 , 39178 , July 7, 2005) that followed the NPRM revised § 165.809(a) so that it maintained the Corpus Christi Inner Harbor security zone. That 2005 rule also …
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
Citation: 85 FR 48107
