Supercalendered Paper From Canada: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [C-122-854] AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has conducted an expedited review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on supercalendered paper (SC paper) from Canada. The period of review (POR) for which we are measuring subsidies is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. We determine that Irving Paper Limited received countervailable subsidies during the POR and that Catalyst received de minimis countervailable subsidies. As a result of this determination, we are excluding Catalyst from the countervailing duty order on SC paper from Canada. DATES: Effective April 24, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toby Vandall or Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1664 and (202) 482-0189, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the Preliminary Results of the expedited review on November 28, 2016. [ 1 ] A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full ( printed page 18897) discussion of the issues raised by parties for the final results, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum  [ 2 ] issued concurrently with, and hereby …