Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Review in Part; 2009-2010

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-588-804, A-412-801] AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 21, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom. [ 1 ] On March 25, 2014, the Department issued its post-preliminary analysis in these reviews. For these final results, we continue to find that sales of the subject merchandise have not been made at prices below normal value. DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 21, 2011, the Department published, and invited interested parties to comment on, the Preliminary Results. [ 2 ] The period of reviews is May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We received case and rebuttal briefs from various parties to these reviews. On July 15, 2011, the Department discontinued these reviews. [ 3 ] The Department resumed these reviews effective November 29, 2013, pursuant to court judgment. [ 4 ] On March 25, 2014, we issued a post-preliminary analysis in which we (1) addressed the methodol…