Commerce Department, International Trade Administration
On July 27, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed and remanded a decision of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) and ordered it to reinstate the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation covering the period April 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, as applied to PSC VSMPO- AVISMA Corporation (VSMPO-AVISMA). See PSC VSMPO-AVISMA Corp. v. United States, 688 F.3d 751 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (AVISMA IV); see also Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 52642 (September 10, 2008) (Final Results). On November 20, 2012, the CIT issued final judgment pursuant to the CAFC's remand order in AVISMA IV reinstating the final results of administrative review with respect to VSMPO-AVISMA. See PSC VSMPO- AVISMA Corp. v. United States, Consol. Court No 08-00321, Slip Op. 12- 142 (Ct. Int'l Trade November 20, 2012) (AVISMA V). Having previously amended the final results of administrative review pursuant to the earlier CIT decision, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is, in accordance with AVISMA V, once again amending the final results of the administrative review with respect to VSMPO-AVISMA to reinstate its original determination. See Final Results.
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-821-819] AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 27, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed and remanded a decision of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) and ordered it to reinstate the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the Russian Federation covering the period April 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, as applied to PSC VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation (VSMPO-AVISMA). See PSC VSMPO-AVISMA Corp. v. United States, 688 F.3d 751 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ( AVISMA IV ); see also Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 52642 (September 10, 2008) ( Final Results ). On November 20, 2012, the CIT issued final judgment pursuant to the CAFC's remand order in AVISMA IV reinstating the final results of administrative review with respect to VSMPO-AVISMA. See PSC VSMPO-AVISMA Corp. v. United States, Consol. Court No 08-00321, Slip Op. 12-142 (Ct. Int'l Trade November 20, 2012) ( AVISMA V ). Having previously amended the final results of administrative review pursuant to the earlier CIT decision, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is, in accordance with AVISMA V, once again amending the final results of the administrative review with respect to VSMPO-AVISMA to reinstate its original dete…
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision
Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to Five-Year Sunset Review
Citation: 77 FR 73979
