Base
Notice07-26752007-05-30

In the Matter of: Rufina Sanchez Lopez, Principal; Winter Aircraft Products SA; a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA; C/Ferrocarril 41; 1 DCHA; 28045 Madrid Spain; Respondent; Final Decision and Order

Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau

Document Excerpt

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security [Docket No. 05-BIS-16] This matter is before me upon a Recommended Decision and Order of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). In a charging letter filed on September 12, 2005, the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) alleged that Respondent, Rufina Sanchez Lopez, (“Sanchez Lopez”), in her capacity as Principal of Winter Aircraft Products SA (“Winter Aircraft”), committed two violations of the Export Administration Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774 ) (2007)) (“Regulations”)  [ 1 ] , issued under the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 ( printed page 29961) (2000)) (the “Act”). [ 2 ] Specifically, the charging letter alleged that between on or about November 1, 2000, and on or about November 17, 2000, Sanchez Lopez took actions with intent to evade the Regulations. Specifically, on or about November 1, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting through her company Winter Aircraft, acquired aircraft parts, items subject to the Regulations and classified under Export Control Classification Number (“ECCN”) 9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent to transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft failed to inform the U.S. suppliers of the ultimate destination of the items and, as such, no license was obtained from the U.S. Government for this transaction, as was required by Section 746.7 of the

Read full document on FederalRegister.gov →

Full Document

Citation: 72 FR 29960