Commerce Department, Industry and Security Bureau
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security [Docket No. 04-BIS-14] Order Making Denial of Export Privileges Against Sunford Trading, Ltd. Applicable to Related Persons Pursuant to section 766.23 of the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”), the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”), has requested that I make the denial order that was imposed against Sunford Trading, Ltd. on August 25, 2005 applicable to the following entities, as persons related to Sunford Trading, Ltd: On August 25, 2005, an order was published in the Federal Register that imposed a three year denial of export privileges against Sunford Trading, Ltd., Room 2208, 22/F, 118 Connaught Road West, Hong Kong, China ( 70 FR 49910 , August 25, 2005) resulting from the settlement of administrative charges that were pending against Sunford related to its involvement in the illegal export of an industrial hot press furnace to the People's Republic of China. BIS has presented evidence that indicates that the Related Persons are related to Sunford Trading, Ltd. by ownership control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business, and that it is necessary to add these persons to the denial order against Sunford Trading, Ltd. in order to avoid evasion of that order. BIS has notified all Related Persons of this action in accordance with the requ…
Other Federal Register documents from the same docket.
Citation: 71 FR 13581
