Certain Canary Yellow Self-Stick Repositionable Note Products; Notice of Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to Print-Inform GMBH & Co. on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, and Terminating the Investigation in its Entirety

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. International Trade Commission [Inv. No. 337-TA-467] AGENCY: International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (“ALJ's”) initial determination (“ID”) terminating the above-captioned ( printed page 70241) investigation as to respondent Print-Inform GmbH & Co. (“Print-Inform”) on the basis of a settlement agreement. Inasmuch as Print-Inform is the last remaining respondent, its termination terminates the investigation in its entirety. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Diehl, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3095. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server ( http://www.usitc.gov ). Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS-ON-LINE) at http://dockets.usitc.gov/​eol/​public . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 7, 2002, based on a complaint filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (now known as 3M Company) of St. Paul, Minnesota (“3M”). The complaint named Ja…