Base
RuleSignificant00-202000-01-18

Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

In accordance with section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is taking final action on petitions filed by eight Northeastern States seeking to mitigate interstate transport of nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>), one of the precursors of ground-level ozone. In an action published on May 25, 1999, EPA determined that portions of the petitions are approvable under the 1-hour and/or 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) based on their technical merit. However, EPA deferred making section 126 findings as long as States and EPA stayed on track to meet the requirements of the NO<INF>X</INF> State implementation plan call (NO<INF>X</INF> SIP call). Subsequently, two court rulings affected the May 25 final rule. In one ruling, the court remanded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In a separate action, the court granted a motion to stay the SIP submission deadline for the NO<INF>X</INF> SIP call. In light of the court rulings, EPA is modifying two aspects of the May 25 rule. Based on affirmative technical determinations for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS made in the May 25 rule, today, EPA is making section 126 findings that a number of large electric generating units (EGUs) and large industrial boilers and turbines named in the petitions emit in violation of the CAA prohibition against significantly contributing to nonattainment or maintenance problems in the petitioning States. The EPA is staying indefinitely the affirmative technical determinations based on the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, pending further developments in the NAAQS litigation. The EPA is also finalizing the Federal NO<INF>X</INF> Budget Trading Program as the control remedy for sources affected by today's rule. This requirement replaces the default remedy in the May 25 final rule.

Action & Dates

Action
Final rule.
Dates
The final rule is effective February 17, 2000.
Effective Date
2000-02-17

CFR References

Topics

Administrative practice and procedureAir pollution controlEnvironmental protectionIntergovernmental relationsNitrogen oxidesOzoneReporting and recordkeeping requirements

Document Excerpt

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to the agency docket number / agency internal file number the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 52 and 97 [FRL-6515-5] RIN 2060-AH88 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: In accordance with section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is taking final action on petitions filed by eight Northeastern States seeking to mitigate interstate transport of nitrogen oxides (NO X ), one of the precursors of ground-level ozone. In an action published on May 25, 1999, EPA determined that portions of the petitions are approvable under the 1-hour and/or 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) based on their technical merit. However, EPA deferred making section 126 findings as long as States and EPA stayed on track to meet the requirements of the NO X State implementation plan call (NO X SIP call). Subsequently, two court rulings affected the May 25 final rule. In one ruling, the court remanded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In a separate action, the court granted a motion to stay the SIP submission deadline for the NO X SIP call. In light of the court rulings, EPA is modifying two aspects of the May 25 rule. Based on affirmative technical determinations for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS made in the May 25 rule, today, EPA is making section 126 findings that a number of large electric generating units (EGUs) and large industrial boilers and turbines named in the petitions emit in violation of the CAA prohibition against significantly contributing to nonattainment or maintenance problems in the petit

Read full document on FederalRegister.gov →

Full Document

Citation: 65 FR 2674