Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
429 rulings found for “Raymond”
Revocation of NY N291666; Clerical error
Request for Internal Advice; Tariff classification of a table napkin dispenser
Protest No. 4601-19-107229; Sufficiency of Documents Submitted to Receive Drawback of Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Tax; 19 U.S.C. § 1313(p); petroleum derivatives.
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 300123104920; Classification of a certain “puffer cabinet”
Ricoh MV715 Multi-function Digital Office Machine; Fax, Copier, Optional Printer Interface; NY 892321 Revoked.
Ricoh Aficio 340; Ricoh Aficio 350; Ricoh Aficio 450; Ricoh Aficio 550; Ricoh Aficio 650; Multi-function Digital Office Machine; Fax; Copier; Optional Printer Interface; NY E80322 Revoked.
Ricoh 355; Ricoh 455; Multi-function Digital Office Machine; Fax, Copier, Optional Printer Interface; NY E81729 Revoked.
Protest number 4601-04-100386; Bearings Limited; Misapplication of Commerce Instructions
Protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333; Faucet Aerators: Parts: Accessories Dear Port Director:This is our decision on protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333 filed by counsel on behalf of NEOPERL Company, Inc., against your action regarding the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of parts for faucet aerators. FACTS:The merchandise at issue was liquidated on January 5, 2001, and a protest with application for further review was filed on January 24, 2001. The protest was denied on December 13, 2002, but he denial was set aside under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1515(d) at the request of the counsel for the protestant by letter, dated February 4, 2003. Under 19 U.S.C. 1515(d). Customs and Border Protection (CBP) "may on its own initiative, or pursuant to a written request by the protesting party filed with the appropriate port director within 90 days after the date of the protest denial, void the denial of the protest." After s
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA.The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Eligibility of men’s knit garments made of foreign-origin collars and cuffs made from circular knit fabric under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA)
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-150098Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-150098, filed by Expeditors International, on behalf of their client, The Gap, Inc. Protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit garments under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and subheading 6105.10.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Protest No. 4601-04-101505; Defective Merchandise; 19 CFR § 158.12(a)
Request for Internal Advice; Watch Production Incentive Certificate Claims
Further Review of Protest No. 4601-04-100947; Separator; General Rule of Interpretation 3.
Stainless steel forged flanges; Protest No. 4601-06-100726
Request for Internal Advice concerning the Classification of a Neoprene Laptop Sleeve
Application for Further Review of Protest No 4601-07-101260; Manganese Mextral Tablets
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-07-101665; 19 C.F.R. §174.24(b); Tariff classification of a certain drain cleaning hand tool.
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-07-101893; foot warmers
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-07-102033
Dutiability of Payments Made to Obtain Quota; Deduction of International Transportation Costs; IA
Protest and Application for Further Review 4601-08-100527; First Sale; Insufficient Documentation
Internal advice request concerning the classification of certain oat ingredients
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-09-101313; Jeans