Search 220,000+ classification decisions from the CBP CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) database. Rulings explain how CBP classifies goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, providing binding precedent for importers, customs brokers, and trade compliance teams.
2,557 rulings found for “Silk”
Country of origin marking of surgical suture products
Country of origin determination for women's suit jacket; 19 CFR Section 102.21(c)(4); most important assembly or manufacturing operation
Protest 1001-96-106230; Multi-Tiered Sales Transaction
Request for Ruling on “Cheer Leader Pompom”; Heading 5609, HTSUSA; Not Trimming; Not “Pompons” Within the Meaning of Heading 5808, HTSUSA and Explanatory Note (B) to Heading 5808, HTSUSA.
Request for Ruling on ?Cheerleading Pom Pom?; Heading 5609, HTSUSA; Not Trimming; Not ?Pompons? Within the Meaning of Heading 5808, HTSUSA and Explanatory Note (B) to Heading 5808, HTSUSA.
Modification of HRL 558935; “reembroidery” of lace fabric; alteration
Protest 1001-99-101433; Scissors; Shears; Poultry shears; Finger rings. Dear Port Director: The following is our decision regarding Protest 1001-99-101433, which concerns the classification of the “Tristar deluxe all purpose shears,” and a pair of “poultry shears,” under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). These two articles were entered on February 9, 1998, and Customs liquidated the entry on December 18, 1998. Counsel for Lifetime Hoan Corporation (“the protestant”) timely filed the protest on March 18, 1999. FACTS:
“Aba” imported from India; not “India Item” exempt from quota
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-00-101527, filed April 5, 2000, Concerning the classification of women’s one-piece undergarment
Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (“NY”) F83276; Calming pond; Serenity Pond
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1703-00- 100076; Classification of Napped Bed Sheets
Reconsideration of NY G80140; "Quietude fountain" Dear Mr. Fitch: This is in reply to your letter of August 31, 2000, to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division, New York, on behalf of the Pomeroy Collection, Ltd., requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter ("NY") G80140, dated August 15, 2000, concerning the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS"), of the "Quietude" fountain. NY G80140 classified the article under subheading 7013.99.50, HTSUS, which provides for glassware of a kind used for... indoor decoration or similar purposes... other glassware: other: other: valued over thirty cents but not over three dollars each. Your request was forwarded to this office for reply. A sample was provided for our consideration. We regret the delay. FACTS: The article was described in NY G80140 as follows:
Napped Bed Sheets; Modification of NY F83310
Napped Bed Linen from Portugal; Revocation of NY D87088
Napped Bed Linen from Portugal; Revocation of NY D87089
Napped Bed Linen from Portugal; Revocation of NY E81441
Internal Advice; Protest No. 1703-00-100026; Coastal Paper Co., Inc. (Importer of Record); The Hipage Company, Inc. (Customs Broker); 19 U.S.C. § 1520 and 1514; Computime, Inc. v. United States, 622 F. Supp. 1083 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1985); Concentric Pumps, Ltd. v. United States, 643 F. Supp. 623 (Ct. Int’l Trade1986); Executone Information Systems v. United States, 96 F. 3d 1383, 1386 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Boast, Inc. v. United States, 17 C.I.T. 114, 117 (1993); Fibrous Glass Products, Inc. v. United States, 63 Cust. Ct. 62 (1969); Fabrene, Inc. v. United States, 17 C.I.T. 911, 914-15 (1993). C.J. Tower and Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States, 499 F.2d 1277 (1974); Taban Co. v. United States, 960 F. Supp. 326, 334-35 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1997); Zaki Corp. v. United States, 960 F. Supp. 350, 359-360 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1997); HQ 223524 (February 13, 1992); ITT v. United States, 24 F.3d 1384, 1387 (Fed. Cir. 1994); HQ 226151(October 6, 1996); HQ 220042 (April 10, 1989); PPG Industries, Inc. v. U
Application For Further Review of 2720-97-100784; Classification of Women's Tencel Lyocell Trousers; Legal Note1 to Chapter 54; Synthetic and Artificial Fibers; Chemical Transformation
Request for classification of four jute and bead necklaces: India Items
Classification of Women's Tencel Lyocell Shirt; Legal Note1 to Chapter 54; Synthetic and Artificial Fibers; No Chemical Transformation
Revocation of NY G83141; "Oxygen" Scooter and Carrying Case
HQ 089373 revoked: sterile and non-sterile sutures with or without needles
Request for Reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter F82426, dated February 22, 2000, on the Tariff Classification of a "Smart Glove" wrist support Dear Dr. MacMorran: This is in reply to your letter of October 10, 2004, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter F82426, dated February 22, 2000, classifying your product described as a "Smart Glove" wrist support in subheading 6116.92.6440, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), as a fingerless mitt. You assert that the "Smart Glove" is an orthopedic wrist support classifiable in either subheading 9021.19.8500, HTSUSA, or subheading 6307.90.9889, HTSUSA. You submitted a sample of the "Smart Glove", a summary of a study performed on the "Smart Glove", and a number of customer testimonials to aid us in our determination. FACTS: The merchandise under consideration, designated as a "Smart Glove", is made from two layers of a knit fabric which is 90 percent cotton and 10 percent spandex. This fabr
Classification of Presaturated Clean Room Wipes; SatPax 1200 Sterile and SatPax 1200
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4101-06-100051; Tariff Classification of Polyurethane Coated Fabric
