Base
N3346692023-09-12New YorkOrigin

The country of origin of Frozen Grilled Dried Sockeye Salmon

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database

Summary

The country of origin of Frozen Grilled Dried Sockeye Salmon

Ruling Text

N334669 September 12, 2023 OT:RR:NC:N5:231 CATEGORY: Origin Peter Sterling Sterling CHB Inc. 870 Franklin Avenue Valley Stream, NY 11580 RE:  The country of origin of Frozen Grilled Dried Sockeye Salmon Dear Mr. Sterling: In your letter dated August 14, 2023, you requested a country of origin ruling on Frozen Grilled Dried Sockeye Salmon You outlined a scenario whereby sockeye salmon caught in Russian Federation waters and/or by Russian Federation vessels are transported frozen to Japan for processing. The processing of the sockeye salmon consists of thawing, sorting, washing, eliminating fins, tails, brown meat, center cutting, washing, brining, drying, grilling and cooling the product by fan.  Further, all broken pieces are removed, the product is vacuum packed, sanitized with hot water then cooled down with cold water prior to being frozen and packed to be shipped to the United States. You seek a determination as to the proper country of origin of the above-described product for marking purposes. The “country of origin” is defined in 19 C.F.R. § 134.1(b) as “the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the ‘country of origin’ within the meaning of this part.” The courts have held that a substantial transformation occurs when an article emerges from a process with a new name, character or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 CCPA 267, C.A.D. 98 (1940); National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 CIT 308 (1992), aff'd, 989 F. 2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass’n v. United States, 207 U.S. 556 (1908) and Uniroyal Inc. v. United States, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982). However, if the manufacturing or combining process is merely a minor one that leaves the identity of the article intact, a substantial transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 542 F. Supp. 1026, 1029 (1982), aff'd, 702 F.2d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Substantial transformation determinations are based on the totality of the evidence. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) W968434, dated January 17, 2007, citing Ferrostaal Metals Corp. v. United States, 11 CIT 470, 478, 664 F. Supp. 535, 541 (1987). In the case of the above-described sockeye salmon, this office finds that the article is substantially transformed due to the processing in Japan. Accordingly, based on the information presented, the packages of Frozen Grilled Dried Sockeye Salmon are products of Japan for CBP marking purposes. The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP. Please note that seafood is subject to the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) requirements administered by the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). We advise you to check with that agency for their further guidance on your scenario. Contact information for AMS is as follows: USDA-AMS-LS-SAT Room 2607-S, Stop 0254 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20250-0254 Tel. 202.720.4486 Website: www.ams.usda.gov/COOL Email address for inquiries: COOL@usda.gov This merchandise is subject to The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Information on the Bioterrorism Act can be obtained by calling the FDA at 301.575.0156, or at the Web site www.fda.gov/oc/bioterrorism/bioact.html. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Ekeng Manczuk at ekeng.b.manczuk@cbp.dhs.gov. Sincerely, Steven A. Mack Director National Commodity Specialist Division

Related Rulings

Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.