U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database
The country of origin and marking of a wireless doorbell speaker/chime from China
N309555 February 21, 2020 MAR-2-85:OT:RR:NC:N2:209 CATEGORY: Marking, Country of Origin Yu-Shan Lee Alpha Networks Inc. No. 8 Li-shing 7th Rd, Science-based Industrial Park Hsinchu, 30078 Taiwan RE: The country of origin and marking of a wireless doorbell speaker/chime from China Dear Ms. Lee : In your letter dated February 6, 2020, you requested a country of origin and marking ruling. The item concerned is a wireless doorbell speaker/chime. It is used to provide an audible signal which indicates that someone is at the users door. It wirelessly receives a signal from a wireless doorbell through a home network. Within Taiwan the device’s printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) is manufactured. The manufacturing process consists of downloading/flashing integrated circuits with an operating program. Then the integrated circuits and a variety of other electrical elements/components are soldered to a printed circuit board using solder printing machines, pick and place component placement machines, and a reflow oven. Then the PCBA is inspected both visually and using an X-ray inspection machine. Finally, the finished PCBAs are packaged and shipped to China for the final assembly process. In China the PCBAs are assembled within a housing. This assembly process simply involves screwing the PCBA and housing together and then running a variety of final tests. The marking statute, Section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article. The “country of origin” is defined in 19 CFR 134.1(b) as “the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the 'country of origin' within the meaning of this part; however, for a good of a NAFTA country, the NAFTA Marking Rules will determine the country of origin.” For tariff purposes, the courts have held that a substantial transformation occurs when an article emerges from a process with a new name, character or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 CCPA 267, C.A.D. 98 (1940); National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 CIT 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F. 2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Anheuser Busch Brewing Association v. The United States, 207 U.S. 556 (1908) and Uniroyal Inc. v. United States, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982). However, if the manufacturing or combining process is merely a minor one that leaves the identity of the article intact, a substantial transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 CIT 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026, 1029 (1982), aff’d, 702 F.2d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Substantial transformation determinations are based on the totality of the evidence. See Headquarters Ruling (HQ) W968434, date January 17, 2007, citing Ferrostaal Metals Corp. v. United States, 11 CIT 470, 478, 664 F. Supp. 535, 541 (1987). Based upon the facts presented, it is the opinion of this office that the manufacturing process that takes place in Taiwan is substantial and complex. The various electrical components/elements from various countries of origin are transformed in Taiwan into a different article with a new name, character, and use. The assembly process that takes place in China, does not result in a substantial transformation of the PCBA. The assembly process does not result in a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, and use. Therefore, the chime/speaker is considered a product of the Taiwan for origin and marking purposes at time of importation into the United States. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Steven Pollichino at steven.pollichino@cbp.dhs.gov. Sincerely, Steven A. Mack Director National Commodity Specialist Division
Other CBP classification decisions referencing the same tariff code.