Base
L824092005-03-08New YorkClassification

The tariff classification of paper punches from China

U.S. Customs and Border Protection · CROSS Database · 1 HTS code referenced

Cross-Source Intelligence

Primary HTS Code

7907.00.6000

$28.1M monthly imports

Compare All →

Court Cases

2 cases

CIT & Federal Circuit

Ruling Age

21 years

Data compiled from CBP CROSS Rulings, Census Bureau Trade Data, CourtListener (CIT/CAFC) · As of 2026-04-30 · Updates monthly

Summary

The tariff classification of paper punches from China

Ruling Text

NY L82409 March 8, 2005 CLA-2-79:RR:NC:N1:113: L82409 CATEGORY: Classification TARIFF NO.: 7907.00.6000 Ms. Stephanie De Silva Avon Products, Inc. 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 RE: The tariff classification of paper punches from China Dear Ms. De Silva: In your letter dated February 14, 2005, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The merchandise is a set containing two paper punches and a sheet of small adhesive pads (item number PP 292103). The punches are made of a zinc alloy within a plastic housing. Placed on a flat surface and using hand pressure, one cuts a star shape, and the other, a flower shape. The punches will be used by crafters to decorate scrapbooks. The adhesive pads are designed to attach the shapes to paper. The applicable subheading for the paper punch set will be 7907.00.6000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other articles of zinc, other. The rate of duty will be 3 percent ad valorem. This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177). A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist James Smyth at 646-733-3018. Sincerely, Robert B. Swierupski Director, National Commodity Specialist Division

Court of International Trade & Federal Circuit (1)

CIT and CAFC court opinions related to the tariff classifications in this ruling.